Skip to content

meeting field: add identifier #1972

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
kpsherva opened this issue Mar 13, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2015
Open

meeting field: add identifier #1972

kpsherva opened this issue Mar 13, 2025 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #2015
Assignees

Comments

@kpsherva
Copy link
Contributor

In some cases, the meetings have identifiers (also counting URLs in), currently not present in the contrib meeting custom field. We should add it.

@tmorrell
Copy link
Contributor

There is a meeting website field which is good for urls. Do you have examples of meetings using identifiers that would be separate from the meeting website?

@kpsherva kpsherva self-assigned this Apr 1, 2025
@kpsherva kpsherva moved this from Ready to In progress in Sprint Q1/2025 Apr 2, 2025
@kpsherva kpsherva moved this from In progress to Ready in Sprint Q1/2025 Apr 4, 2025
@kpsherva kpsherva moved this from Ready to In progress in Sprint Q1/2025 Apr 11, 2025
kpsherva added a commit to kpsherva/invenio-rdm-records that referenced this issue Apr 14, 2025
@kpsherva kpsherva moved this from In progress to In review 🔍 in Sprint Q1/2025 Apr 14, 2025
@kpsherva kpsherva linked a pull request Apr 14, 2025 that will close this issue
@ntarocco ntarocco moved this from In review 🔍 to In progress in Sprint Q1/2025 Apr 16, 2025
kpsherva added a commit to kpsherva/invenio-rdm-records that referenced this issue Apr 17, 2025
@kpsherva kpsherva moved this from In progress to In review 🔍 in Sprint Q1/2025 Apr 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In review 🔍
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants