Skip to content

Update Jekyll-Archives on RubyGems.org to support Jekyll 3 #52

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 27, 2015
Merged

Update Jekyll-Archives on RubyGems.org to support Jekyll 3 #52

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 27, 2015

Conversation

manuelgruber
Copy link
Member

@alfredxing
@parkr

I'm using Bundler in order to manage gem dependencies for Jekyll. In order to upgrade to Jekyll 3, I was running the command bundle update. Unfortunately Bundle wasn't upgrading to v3.0.0 and was still using Jekyll 2. After investigation i found out only removing "jekyll-archives" from the Gemfile will solve the problem.

Reason:
The Gem page on RubyGems.org is using v2.0.0 with the fixed dependency jekyll ~> 2.4. See attached screenshot.

ja-rubygems

On the master branch (aka HEAD) the dependency issue is already fixed.
So let's increase the version of Jekyll-Archives, so that the changes for Jekyll 3 will be available on RubyGems.org.

ToDo after merge:

  • Add release tag "v2.1.0"
  • Publish version 2.1.0 on RubyGems.org

@opattison
Copy link

👍 Right now I am using jekyll-archives sourced from the GitHub master branch, which I think is working. This feels like a hack until the gem dependency is updated.

@alfredxing
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Though I don't think that the Travis build version is the issue that is causing this, I think it's just because I haven't released the latest version yet (which I will do now!)

I'll merge in this PR though, since everything here is helpful!

alfredxing added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2015
@alfredxing alfredxing merged commit 7ce95e6 into jekyll:master Oct 27, 2015
alfredxing added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2015
@manuelgruber
Copy link
Member Author

@alfredxing Thanks.

@alfredxing
Copy link
Member

No problem! I just realized that #51 is still outstanding, so I'll be waiting for that before I release v2.1.0 here (since that PR fixes a bug with Jekyll 3 compatibility).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants