Add forking support in surefire provider #382
Conversation
| } | ||
|
|
||
| @Test | ||
| @Disabled("Methods annotated with @TestFactory are not accepted, they are containers, not tests") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Classes which contain only @TestFactory annotated methods do not seem to be discovered by surefire provider. This condition https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/blob/master/junit-platform-surefire-provider/src/main/java/org/junit/platform/surefire/provider/TestPlanScannerFilter.java#L38 accepts only test methods and @TestFactory methods are containers.
Please let me know if it is valuable to keep these disabled tests here or not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Awesome, I'll rebase this PR today.
Forking requires two methods to be implemented in JUnitPlatformProvider: 1) `#getSuites()` - defines set of test classes for the future forks to execute 2) `#invoke(Object)` - called inside a fork with a `Class` argument from (1) This commit adds implementation of `#getSuits()` and alters `#invoke(Object)` to support forking. It also adds unit tests for all classes in junit-platform-surefire-provider module.
lutovich
force-pushed
the
issue363-surefire-fork-support
branch
from
7ad1c31 to
af9aba2
Compare
|
Looks good to me! @junit-team/junit-lambda Any objections on merging this? |
|
Based on principle, I am all for having this support, but I haven't reviewed it personally. So, if you think it's good to go, then... merge it! |
|
@marcphilipp yes, I can work on such tests. they should be part of |
|
Yep. 👍 |
|
Thanks to the newly added tests, our test coverage went from 93.4% to 95.3%. 👍 |
Overview
Forking requires two methods to be implemented in JUnitPlatformProvider:
#getSuites()- defines set of test classes for the future forks to execute#invoke(Object)- called inside a fork with aClassargument from (1)This PR adds implementation of
#getSuits()and alters#invoke(Object)to support forking. It also adds unit tests for all classes in junit-platform-surefire-provider module.Fixes #362 #363
I hereby agree to the terms of the JUnit Contributor License Agreement.