Skip to content

adding an article regarding JWT best practices #76

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

nathannguyenn
Copy link

Preliminary checks

Summary

Explain the motivation for making this change. What does does this bring to the table?

I would like to add to the directory a blog post going over some JWT implementation best practices. I found the article to be well written and providing a good follow up to the existing articles, after the reader has learned the basic concepts and implementation.

Thank you in advance for your considerations!

@kdeldycke kdeldycke added the 🆕 new link A link worth adding to the list label Mar 31, 2022
@kdeldycke
Copy link
Owner

The whole JWT section needs to be thoroughly curated I guess, I'm pretty sure the question in the article you propose are answered in content already referenced in the list. Can you tell me what makes this article original? Thanks in advance! :)

@kdeldycke
Copy link
Owner

With a link to loginradius.com already existing in the awesome-iam list (see: PKCE Explained), the overcrowded section on JWT and the lack of update from the original author of this PR, I propose to pass on the addition of that link.

@kdeldycke kdeldycke closed this Apr 28, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2022

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 1, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
🆕 new link A link worth adding to the list
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants