-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 582
feat(CategoryTheory/Sites): morphisms and homotopies of 1
-hypercovers
#26326
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat(CategoryTheory/Sites): morphisms and homotopies of 1
-hypercovers
#26326
Conversation
PR summary 22cd4a1164Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
|
Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <[email protected]>
This PR also seems to suffer from https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/287929-mathlib4/topic/Failing.20CI/with/525466176. |
Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <[email protected]>
admits a morphism `h : W ⟶ E` such that `h ≫ f` and `h ≫ g` are homotopic. Hence | ||
they become equal after quotienting out by homotopy. -/ | ||
@[simps! toPreOneHypercover] | ||
noncomputable def cylinder (f g : E.Hom F.toPreOneHypercover) : J.OneHypercover S := |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you introduce an abbrev OneHypercover.Hom
?
We define refinement morphisms and homotopies between morphisms of (pre-)-
1
-hypercovers. As a sanity check, we show that1
-hypercovers is cofiltered up to homotopies, i.e. for any two refinement morphisms there exists a refinement from the left such that both compositions are homotopic.In the next PR, we define the (homotopy) category of
1
-hypercovers with refinement morphisms modulo homotopy. This will be a cofiltered category and taking a colimit over these will give a second approach to sheafification.