Skip to content

va: Use Identifier in IsCAAValidRequest #8153

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

va: Use Identifier in IsCAAValidRequest #8153

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

jprenken
Copy link
Contributor

@jprenken jprenken commented May 1, 2025

In vapb.IsCAAValidRequest, even though CAA is only for DNS names, deprecate Domain in favour of Identifier for consistency.

In DoCAA, reject attempts to validate CAA for non-DNS identifiers.

Rename identifier to ident inside some VA functions, also for consistency.

Part of #7995

@jprenken jprenken requested a review from a team as a code owner May 1, 2025 01:39
@jprenken jprenken requested a review from aarongable May 1, 2025 01:39
jprenken added a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2025
@jprenken jprenken requested a review from aarongable May 1, 2025 20:24
aarongable
aarongable previously approved these changes May 1, 2025
@aarongable aarongable requested a review from jsha May 1, 2025 23:03
jprenken added 3 commits May 1, 2025 17:40
Even though CAA is only for DNS names, deprecate `Domain` in favour of `Identifier` for consistency.

In `DoCAA`, reject attempts to validate CAA for non-DNS identifiers.

Rename `identifier` to `ident` inside some VA functions, also for consistency.
jprenken added 2 commits May 1, 2025 17:49
Even though CAA is only for DNS names, deprecate `Domain` in favour of `Identifier` for consistency.

In `DoCAA`, reject attempts to validate CAA for non-DNS identifiers.

Rename `identifier` to `ident` inside some VA functions, also for consistency.
jprenken added a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants