Skip to content

api: user: added disabled field #1904

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 31, 2023
Merged

api: user: added disabled field #1904

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 31, 2023

Conversation

gioelecerati
Copy link
Member

What does this pull request do? Explain your changes. (required)

  • Added disabled field to user to be used when usage limit is reached for the free tier

Specific updates (required)

How did you test each of these updates (required)

Does this pull request close any open issues?

Screenshots (optional)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 29, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
livepeer-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 31, 2023 4:15pm

app.patch(
"/:id/disabled",
validatePost("disable-user-payload"),
authorizer({ anyAdmin: true }),

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Missing rate limiting

This route handler performs [authorization](1), but is not rate-limited.
@gioelecerati gioelecerati marked this pull request as ready for review October 9, 2023 14:12
@gioelecerati gioelecerati requested a review from a team as a code owner October 9, 2023 14:12
@gioelecerati gioelecerati merged commit dd965e2 into master Oct 31, 2023
@gioelecerati gioelecerati deleted the gio/api/disabled-users branch October 31, 2023 16:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants