Skip to content

crypto: new VerificationLevel::MismatchedSender #5219

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 12, 2025

Conversation

richvdh
Copy link
Member

@richvdh richvdh commented Jun 11, 2025

If we believe that the sender of a room event has been spoofed, use a dedicated VerificationLevel, possibly allowing us to treat such events more carefully.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.15%. Comparing base (404a982) to head (0aece69).
Report is 32 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5219      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.16%   85.15%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         329      329              
  Lines       36923    36924       +1     
==========================================
- Hits        31446    31441       -5     
- Misses       5477     5483       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@richvdh richvdh marked this pull request as ready for review June 11, 2025 21:41
@richvdh richvdh requested review from a team as code owners June 11, 2025 21:41
@richvdh richvdh requested review from poljar and removed request for a team June 11, 2025 21:41
@richvdh richvdh merged commit 6ab11a0 into main Jun 12, 2025
49 checks passed
@richvdh richvdh deleted the rav/megolm_sender_verification_main branch June 12, 2025 11:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants