Skip to content

Python: Improve plan and execute sample #11370

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 4, 2025

Conversation

moonbox3
Copy link
Contributor

@moonbox3 moonbox3 commented Apr 4, 2025

Motivation and Context

The current version of the processes' "plan and execute" sample worked but it didn't format the output or intermediate output in a nice way. This PR improves the formatting of the output and thus the final answer.

Description

Improve the sample.

Contribution Checklist

@moonbox3 moonbox3 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 4, 2025 04:22
@moonbox3 moonbox3 self-assigned this Apr 4, 2025
@moonbox3 moonbox3 added the agents label Apr 4, 2025
@markwallace-microsoft markwallace-microsoft added python Pull requests for the Python Semantic Kernel and removed agents labels Apr 4, 2025
@moonbox3 moonbox3 added agents processes and removed python Pull requests for the Python Semantic Kernel labels Apr 4, 2025
@moonbox3 moonbox3 enabled auto-merge April 4, 2025 13:33
@moonbox3 moonbox3 added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 4, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Apr 4, 2025
@TaoChenOSU TaoChenOSU added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into microsoft:main with commit 843ae61 Apr 4, 2025
35 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Sprint: Done in Semantic Kernel Apr 4, 2025
glorious-beard pushed a commit to glorious-beard/semantic-kernel that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2025
### Motivation and Context

The current version of the processes' "plan and execute" sample worked
but it didn't format the output or intermediate output in a nice way.
This PR improves the formatting of the output and thus the final answer.

<!-- Thank you for your contribution to the semantic-kernel repo!
Please help reviewers and future users, providing the following
information:
  1. Why is this change required?
  2. What problem does it solve?
  3. What scenario does it contribute to?
  4. If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here.
-->

### Description

Improve the sample.

<!-- Describe your changes, the overall approach, the underlying design.
These notes will help understanding how your code works. Thanks! -->

### Contribution Checklist

<!-- Before submitting this PR, please make sure: -->

- [X] The code builds clean without any errors or warnings
- [X] The PR follows the [SK Contribution
Guidelines](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)
and the [pre-submission formatting
script](https://github.com/microsoft/semantic-kernel/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#development-scripts)
raises no violations
- [X] All unit tests pass, and I have added new tests where possible
- [X] I didn't break anyone 😄
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants