Skip to content

introduce Event type and subsystem for event recorder #370

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

Praveenrajmani
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Praveenrajmani Praveenrajmani force-pushed the disk-logger branch 2 times, most recently from b3d64a1 to d38b04f Compare April 23, 2025 10:55
@Praveenrajmani Praveenrajmani force-pushed the disk-logger branch 2 times, most recently from d3f47a2 to 4ab5b49 Compare April 28, 2025 07:37
Bucket string `json:"bucket,omitempty"`
Object string `json:"object,omitempty"`
VersionID string `json:"versionId,omitempty"`
Tags map[string]interface{} `json:"tags,omitempty"`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aren't tags map[string]string?

if resp.StatusCode != http.StatusOK {
return
}
dec := json.NewDecoder(resp.Body)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If this is to be a high throughput API, consider using msgp for the transfer.

You will need to get rid of the interface{} values. Let me know if you need assistance in setting that up.

(it should be pretty similar to this)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

these jwt libraries have claims defined in {}interface @klauspost let me try to simplify it

@harshavardhana harshavardhana changed the base branch from v3 to main April 29, 2025 18:36
@harshavardhana harshavardhana changed the base branch from main to v3 April 29, 2025 18:37
@harshavardhana
Copy link
Member

Please rebase this with main branch now and move this code to v4

@Praveenrajmani
Copy link
Contributor Author

moving this PR to main

@Praveenrajmani
Copy link
Contributor Author

ec is not yet updated with v4, re-opening this PR

@Praveenrajmani Praveenrajmani reopened this May 5, 2025
@Praveenrajmani
Copy link
Contributor Author

ec is updated with v4 now, closing this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants