Skip to content

Fix tests that serve a model without python_env.yml #14601

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

harupy
Copy link
Member

@harupy harupy commented Feb 14, 2025

🛠 DevTools 🛠

Open in GitHub Codespaces

Install mlflow from this PR

# Use `%sh` to run this command on Databricks
OPTIONS=$(if pip freeze | grep -q 'mlflow @ git+https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow.git'; then echo '--force-reinstall --no-deps'; fi)
pip install $OPTIONS git+https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow.git@refs/pull/14601/merge

Checkout with GitHub CLI

gh pr checkout 14601

Related Issues/PRs

#xxx

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

Fix for MLflow 3.0. In MLflow 3.0, model_info.model_uri is not a file URI, but a model URI. The following lines to remove python_env.yml fail. This PR replaces it with a workaround.

model_artifact_path = Path(mlflow.get_artifact_uri("model").replace("file://", ""))
model_artifact_path.joinpath(_PYTHON_ENV_FILE_NAME).unlink()

How is this PR tested?

  • Existing unit/integration tests
  • New unit/integration tests
  • Manual tests

Does this PR require documentation update?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. I've updated:
    • Examples
    • API references
    • Instructions

Release Notes

Is this a user-facing change?

  • No. You can skip the rest of this section.
  • Yes. Give a description of this change to be included in the release notes for MLflow users.

What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?

Components

  • area/artifacts: Artifact stores and artifact logging
  • area/build: Build and test infrastructure for MLflow
  • area/deployments: MLflow Deployments client APIs, server, and third-party Deployments integrations
  • area/docs: MLflow documentation pages
  • area/examples: Example code
  • area/model-registry: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registry
  • area/models: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavors
  • area/recipes: Recipes, Recipe APIs, Recipe configs, Recipe Templates
  • area/projects: MLproject format, project running backends
  • area/scoring: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFs
  • area/server-infra: MLflow Tracking server backend
  • area/tracking: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologging

Interface

  • area/uiux: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev server
  • area/docker: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Models
  • area/sqlalchemy: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registry
  • area/windows: Windows support

Language

  • language/r: R APIs and clients
  • language/java: Java APIs and clients
  • language/new: Proposals for new client languages

Integrations

  • integrations/azure: Azure and Azure ML integrations
  • integrations/sagemaker: SageMaker integrations
  • integrations/databricks: Databricks integrations

How should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:

  • rn/none - No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" section
  • rn/breaking-change - The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" section
  • rn/feature - A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/bug-fix - A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notes
  • rn/documentation - A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes

Should this PR be included in the next patch release?

Yes should be selected for bug fixes, documentation updates, and other small changes. No should be selected for new features and larger changes. If you're unsure about the release classification of this PR, leave this unchecked to let the maintainers decide.

What is a minor/patch release?
  • Minor release: a release that increments the second part of the version number (e.g., 1.2.0 -> 1.3.0).
    Bug fixes, doc updates and new features usually go into minor releases.
  • Patch release: a release that increments the third part of the version number (e.g., 1.2.0 -> 1.2.1).
    Bug fixes and doc updates usually go into patch releases.
  • Yes (this PR will be cherry-picked and included in the next patch release)
  • No (this PR will be included in the next minor release)

Signed-off-by: harupy <[email protected]>
@harupy harupy requested a review from serena-ruan February 14, 2025 06:38
@github-actions github-actions bot added the rn/none List under Small Changes in Changelogs. label Feb 14, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 14, 2025

Documentation preview for 5938411 will be available when this CircleCI job
completes successfully. You may encounter a {"message":"not found"} error when reloading
a page. If so, add /index.html to the URL.

More info

@harupy harupy changed the title Fix tests emulating Fix tests that serve a model without python_env.yml Feb 14, 2025
Signed-off-by: harupy <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@serena-ruan serena-ruan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@harupy harupy added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 14, 2025
Merged via the queue into mlflow:master with commit 2f4afbb Feb 14, 2025
43 checks passed
@harupy harupy deleted the download-then-serve branch February 14, 2025 08:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rn/none List under Small Changes in Changelogs.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants