Skip to content

Update the def value of server.metrics.filter #2422

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

NataliaIvakina
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@neo4j-docops-agent
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR includes documentation updates
View the updated docs at https://neo4j-docs-operations-2422.surge.sh

Updated pages:

@NataliaIvakina
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Test fails with Setting db.query.default_language not found in docs.
This setting is added in the cypher-25 branch.

@@ -3100,7 +3100,7 @@ a|Specifies which metrics should be enabled by using a comma separated list of g
|Valid values
a|A comma-separated list where each element is A simple globbing pattern that can use `*` and `?`..
|Default value
m|+++*bolt.connections*,*bolt.messages_received*,*bolt.messages_started*,*dbms.pool.bolt.free,*dbms.pool.bolt.total_size,*dbms.pool.bolt.total_used,*dbms.pool.bolt.used_heap,*cluster.raft.is_leader,*cluster.raft.last_leader_message,*cluster.raft.replication_attempt,*cluster.raft.replication_fail,*cluster.raft.last_applied,*cluster.raft.last_appended,*cluster.raft.append_index,*cluster.raft.commit_index,*cluster.raft.applied_index,*cluster.internal.discovery.memberset.left,*cluster.internal.discovery.crdt.gossip_id_data.size,*cluster.internal.discovery.crdt.server_data.size,*cluster.internal.discovery.crdt.database_data.size,*cluster.internal.discovery.crdt.leader_data.size,*cluster.internal.discovery.crdt.total_merge_operations,*cluster.internal.discovery.crdt.total_update_operations,*cluster.internal.discovery.gossip.incoming_queue_size,*cluster.internal.discovery.gossip.total_received_data,*cluster.internal.discovery.gossip.total_sent_data,*cluster.internal.discovery.gossip.uncontactable_members_exist,*check_point.*,*cypher.replan_events,*cypher.cache*,*ids_in_use*,*.neo4j.count.*,*pool.transaction.*.total_used,*pool.transaction.*.used_heap,*pool.transaction.*.used_native,*store.size*,*transaction.active_read,*transaction.active_write,*transaction.committed*,*transaction.last_committed_tx_id,*transaction.peak_concurrent,*transaction.rollbacks*,*page_cache.hit*,*page_cache.page_faults,*page_cache.usage_ratio,*vm.file.descriptors.count,*vm.gc.time.*,*vm.heap.used,*vm.memory.buffer.direct.used,*vm.memory.pool.g1_eden_space,*vm.memory.pool.g1_old_gen,*vm.pause_time,*vm.thread*,*db.query.execution*,*protocol*+++ label:changed[Changed in 2025.03]
m|+++*bolt.connections*,*bolt.messages_received*,*bolt.messages_started*,*dbms.pool.bolt.free,*dbms.pool.bolt.total_size,*dbms.pool.bolt.total_used,*dbms.pool.bolt.used_heap,*cluster.raft.is_leader,*cluster.raft.last_leader_message,*cluster.raft.replication_attempt,*cluster.raft.replication_fail,*cluster.raft.last_applied,*cluster.raft.last_appended,*cluster.raft.append_index,*cluster.raft.commit_index,*cluster.raft.applied_index,*check_point.*,*cypher.replan_events,*cypher.cache*,*ids_in_use*,*.neo4j.count.*,*pool.transaction.*.total_used,*pool.transaction.*.used_heap,*pool.transaction.*.used_native,*store.size*,*transaction.active_read,*transaction.active_write,*transaction.committed*,*transaction.last_committed_tx_id,*transaction.peak_concurrent,*transaction.rollbacks*,*page_cache.hit*,*page_cache.page_faults,*page_cache.usage_ratio,*vm.file.descriptors.count,*vm.gc.time.*,*vm.heap.used,*vm.memory.buffer.direct.used,*vm.memory.pool.g1_eden_space,*vm.memory.pool.g1_old_gen,*vm.pause_time,*vm.thread*,*db.query.execution*,*protocol*+++ label:changed[Changed in 2025.03, 2025.06]
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@NataliaIvakina NataliaIvakina Jun 16, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm wondering if we should to add some clarification here since this value has been modified for the second time in 2025.x series. Should we add a note to specify what exactly has been added or removed?
Also, the original PR in the monorepo is not labeled changelog. Should this change be included in the changelog? If so, the PR 31380 needs to be labeled.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, these labels will only grow as we make more metrics visible. Maybe adding a note instead and explaining what has changed would be better.

Copy link
Collaborator

@renetapopova renetapopova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @NataliaIvakina

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants