-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.9k
doc: clarify concurrency model of test runner #47642
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -379,6 +379,11 @@ Otherwise, the test is considered to be a failure. Test files must be | |||||
executable by Node.js, but are not required to use the `node:test` module | ||||||
internally. | ||||||
|
||||||
Each test file is executed as if it was a regular script. That is, if the test | ||||||
file itself uses `node:test` to define tests, all of those tests will be | ||||||
executed within a single application thread, regardless of the value of the | ||||||
`concurrency` option of [`test()`][]. | ||||||
|
||||||
## Collecting code coverage | ||||||
|
||||||
> Stability: 1 - Experimental | ||||||
|
@@ -731,7 +736,8 @@ added: | |||||
* `options` {Object} Configuration options for running tests. The following | ||||||
properties are supported: | ||||||
* `concurrency` {number|boolean} If a number is provided, | ||||||
then that many files would run in parallel. | ||||||
then that many test processes would run in parallel, where each process | ||||||
corresponds to one test file. | ||||||
If `true`, it would run `os.availableParallelism() - 1` test files in | ||||||
parallel. | ||||||
If `false`, it would only run one test file at a time. | ||||||
|
@@ -795,7 +801,7 @@ changes: | |||||
* `options` {Object} Configuration options for the test. The following | ||||||
properties are supported: | ||||||
* `concurrency` {number|boolean} If a number is provided, | ||||||
then that many tests would run in parallel. | ||||||
then that many tests would run in parallel within the application thread. | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe this adds clarity?
Suggested change
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't think using There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I’m trying to get across that it’s “in parallel” only in the sense that there are several async resources running within the current thread and process, as opposed to “true” parallelism from using multiple threads/processes. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think #47642 (review) is a better suggestion, I agree that "parallel" is simply not a great word to describe what happens here, but let's take that discussion to another PR/issue. |
||||||
If `true`, it would run `os.availableParallelism() - 1` tests in parallel. | ||||||
For subtests, it will be `Infinity` tests in parallel. | ||||||
If `false`, it would only run one test at a time. | ||||||
|
@@ -1766,7 +1772,7 @@ changes: | |||||
* `options` {Object} Configuration options for the subtest. The following | ||||||
properties are supported: | ||||||
* `concurrency` {number|boolean|null} If a number is provided, | ||||||
then that many tests would run in parallel. | ||||||
then that many tests would run in parallel within the application thread. | ||||||
If `true`, it would run all subtests in parallel. | ||||||
If `false`, it would only run one test at a time. | ||||||
If unspecified, subtests inherit this value from their parent. | ||||||
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.