Skip to content

v4.1.x: common/ofi: added address format check to fix provider selection #7943

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 20, 2020

Conversation

dancejic
Copy link
Contributor

@dancejic dancejic commented Jul 14, 2020

bugfix: provider selection would not differentiate between ipv4
and ipv6 addresses which would cause some nodes to be unable
to communicate between each other. Adding a check for address
format to provider selection to ensure that all nodes use the
same address format.

Signed-off-by: Nikola Dancejic [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit 7e46371)

@dancejic dancejic requested review from wckzhang and bwbarrett July 14, 2020 22:48
@dancejic dancejic changed the title common/ofi: added address format check to fix provider selection v4.1.x: common/ofi: added address format check to fix provider selection Jul 14, 2020
@bwbarrett
Copy link
Member

Please see step 8 of https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/wiki/SubmittingPullRequests. You need to include the cherry-pick from line generated by "cherry-pick -x".

bugfix: provider selection would not differentiate between ipv4
and ipv6 addresses which would cause some nodes to be unable
to communicate between each other. Adding a check for address
format to provider selection to ensure that all nodes use the
same address format.

Signed-off-by: Nikola Dancejic <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 7e46371)
@jsquyres
Copy link
Member

@bwbarrett Can you review this PR?

@bwbarrett bwbarrett merged commit 18418bf into open-mpi:v4.1.x Jul 20, 2020
@dancejic dancejic deleted the multi-4.1.x branch October 15, 2020 20:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants