-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
VERIFY3(counts[index] + inner_size <= size) failed (8192 <= 4096) #15604
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I don’t know what the problem is. The pool in question was on the previous system and it has been working normally. This problem occurred when I set root on zfs. There was no response when exporting and destroying the pool. In the end, I could only delete all partitions of this pool. . I have created a new pool, copied the original data, reset zfs on root, and now there are no problems. |
I have the exact same issue on TrueNAS Scale, same ZFS version I assume, for some reason (there was a indirect vdev after removing a mirrored vdev), I can't see the indirect device now, and I am seeing those problems, also, I need to remove a missing SLOG device, and I get this error :( #8748 |
two questions:
|
Hi, I'm having a very similar issue. About 7 or 8 days ago, one of my hard drives in one of the mirrored VDEVs went down, all the other drives were reporting back as good, so I decided to offline the drive and remove the VDEV entirely since my overall pool has enough storage space to absorb the data. I reassigned the now extra drive as a spare vdev for the pool. Everything seemed to run fine and I did a SMART test to make sure all the other drives were good, and a scrub to make sure the pool was still healthy - all checks came back with no errors. Then last night I was trying to access my SMB share and I noticed that it was inaccessible, so I tried to log in to the TrueNAS server and realized it was completely frozen. This is the first time this has ever happened, so I rebooted it and when it was starting it went directly into a Kernel Panic. I’ve tried to do research on what may be causing this issue but I haven’t been able to find much aside from one issue that seemed unrelated. So far the only troubleshooting I could think of is running a MEMTEST86 test to make sure the memory is good, but aside from that I don’t know what else to do. |
Hi! For anyone that is looking for further assistance if they're running into a similar issue, please see this thread: https://forums.truenas.com/t/kernel-panic-with-strange-error/30832/17 Shout out to the TrueNAS community for ALL the help! |
Hi! Another instance of the same problem. I added a new vdev of 2 drives and remove the original vdev using the TrueNas GUI. It work for a couple of days and reboots no problem and today the server just went offline and got stuck in a boot loop worjt the same kernel panic. |
When after device removal we handle block pointers remap, skip blocks that might be cloned. BRTs are indexed by vdev id and offset from block pointer's DVA[0]. So if we start addressing the same block by some different DVA, we won't get the proper reference counter. As result, we might either remap the block twice, that may result in assertion during indirect mapping condense, or free it prematurely, that may result in data overwrite, or free it twice, that may result in assertion in spacemap code. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Fixes openzfs#15604
When after device removal we handle block pointers remap, skip blocks that might be cloned. BRTs are indexed by vdev id and offset from block pointer's DVA[0]. So if we start addressing the same block by some different DVA, we won't get the proper reference counter. As result, we might either remap the block twice, that may result in assertion during indirect mapping condense, or free it prematurely, that may result in data overwrite, or free it twice, that may result in assertion in spacemap code. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Fixes openzfs#15604
When after device removal we handle block pointers remap, skip blocks that might be cloned. BRTs are indexed by vdev id and offset from block pointer's DVA[0]. So if we start addressing the same block by some different DVA, we won't get the proper reference counter. As result, we might either remap the block twice, that may result in assertion during indirect mapping condense, or free it prematurely, that may result in data overwrite, or free it twice, that may result in assertion in spacemap code. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Fixes openzfs#15604
When after device removal we handle block pointers remap, skip blocks that might be cloned. BRTs are indexed by vdev id and offset from block pointer's DVA[0]. So if we start addressing the same block by some different DVA, we won't get the proper reference counter. As result, we might either remap the block twice, that may result in assertion during indirect mapping condense, or free it prematurely, that may result in data overwrite, or free it twice, that may result in assertion in spacemap code. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Fixes openzfs#15604
When after device removal we handle block pointers remap, skip blocks that might be cloned. BRTs are indexed by vdev id and offset from block pointer's DVA[0]. So if we start addressing the same block by some different DVA, we won't get the proper reference counter. As result, we might either remap the block twice, that may result in assertion during indirect mapping condense, or free it prematurely, that may result in data overwrite, or free it twice, that may result in assertion in spacemap code. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Fixes openzfs#15604
When after device removal we handle block pointers remap, skip blocks that might be cloned. BRTs are indexed by vdev id and offset from block pointer's DVA[0]. So if we start addressing the same block by some different DVA, we won't get the proper reference counter. As result, we might either remap the block twice, that may result in assertion during indirect mapping condense, or free it prematurely, that may result in data overwrite, or free it twice, that may result in assertion in spacemap code. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Fixes openzfs#15604
When after device removal we handle block pointers remap, skip blocks that might be cloned. BRTs are indexed by vdev id and offset from block pointer's DVA[0]. So if we start addressing the same block by some different DVA, we won't get the proper reference counter. As result, we might either remap the block twice, that may result in assertion during indirect mapping condense, or free it prematurely, that may result in data overwrite, or free it twice, that may result in assertion in spacemap code. Reviewed-by: Ameer Hamza <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes #15604 Closes #17180
When after device removal we handle block pointers remap, skip blocks that might be cloned. BRTs are indexed by vdev id and offset from block pointer's DVA[0]. So if we start addressing the same block by some different DVA, we won't get the proper reference counter. As result, we might either remap the block twice, that may result in assertion during indirect mapping condense, or free it prematurely, that may result in data overwrite, or free it twice, that may result in assertion in spacemap code. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Fixes openzfs#15604
When after device removal we handle block pointers remap, skip blocks that might be cloned. BRTs are indexed by vdev id and offset from block pointer's DVA[0]. So if we start addressing the same block by some different DVA, we won't get the proper reference counter. As result, we might either remap the block twice, that may result in assertion during indirect mapping condense, or free it prematurely, that may result in data overwrite, or free it twice, that may result in assertion in spacemap code. Reviewed-by: Ameer Hamza <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15604 Closes openzfs#17180
When after device removal we handle block pointers remap, skip blocks that might be cloned. BRTs are indexed by vdev id and offset from block pointer's DVA[0]. So if we start addressing the same block by some different DVA, we won't get the proper reference counter. As result, we might either remap the block twice, that may result in assertion during indirect mapping condense, or free it prematurely, that may result in data overwrite, or free it twice, that may result in assertion in spacemap code. Reviewed-by: Ameer Hamza <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15604 Closes openzfs#17180
When after device removal we handle block pointers remap, skip blocks that might be cloned. BRTs are indexed by vdev id and offset from block pointer's DVA[0]. So if we start addressing the same block by some different DVA, we won't get the proper reference counter. As result, we might either remap the block twice, that may result in assertion during indirect mapping condense, or free it prematurely, that may result in data overwrite, or free it twice, that may result in assertion in spacemap code. Reviewed-by: Ameer Hamza <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15604 Closes openzfs#17180
When after device removal we handle block pointers remap, skip blocks that might be cloned. BRTs are indexed by vdev id and offset from block pointer's DVA[0]. So if we start addressing the same block by some different DVA, we won't get the proper reference counter. As result, we might either remap the block twice, that may result in assertion during indirect mapping condense, or free it prematurely, that may result in data overwrite, or free it twice, that may result in assertion in spacemap code. Reviewed-by: Ameer Hamza <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15604 Closes openzfs#17180
When after device removal we handle block pointers remap, skip blocks that might be cloned. BRTs are indexed by vdev id and offset from block pointer's DVA[0]. So if we start addressing the same block by some different DVA, we won't get the proper reference counter. As result, we might either remap the block twice, that may result in assertion during indirect mapping condense, or free it prematurely, that may result in data overwrite, or free it twice, that may result in assertion in spacemap code. Reviewed-by: Ameer Hamza <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15604 Closes openzfs#17180
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
System information
Describe the problem you're observing
Kernel Panic with zfs on root.
Rebooting the system hangs after "dracut wraning: unmounted /oldroot"
Describe how to reproduce the problem
Boot with commad line : single init=/bin/bash
or
Booting with zfs on root when dracut import pool
Include any warning/errors/backtraces from the system logs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: