-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Fix metaslab group fragmentation math #17037
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pcd1193182
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2025
Since we are calculating a free space fragmentation, we should weight metaslabs by the amount of their free space, not a full size. Fragmentation of full metaslabs may not matter in presence empty ones. The old algorithm did not differentiate metaslabs having only one free 4KB block from metaslabs having 50% of space free in 4KB blocks, reporting higher fragmentation. While there, move metaslab_group_alloc_update() call after setting mg_fragmentation, otherwise the effect may be delayed by one TXG. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc.
tonynguien
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2025
tonyhutter
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2025
ixhamza
pushed a commit
to truenas/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2025
Since we are calculating a free space fragmentation, we should weight metaslabs by the amount of their free space, not a full size. Fragmentation of full metaslabs may not matter in presence empty ones. The old algorithm did not differentiate metaslabs having only one free 4KB block from metaslabs having 50% of space free in 4KB blocks, reporting higher fragmentation. While there, move metaslab_group_alloc_update() call after setting mg_fragmentation, otherwise the effect may be delayed by one TXG. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
ixhamza
pushed a commit
to ixhamza/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2025
Since we are calculating a free space fragmentation, we should weight metaslabs by the amount of their free space, not a full size. Fragmentation of full metaslabs may not matter in presence empty ones. The old algorithm did not differentiate metaslabs having only one free 4KB block from metaslabs having 50% of space free in 4KB blocks, reporting higher fragmentation. While there, move metaslab_group_alloc_update() call after setting mg_fragmentation, otherwise the effect may be delayed by one TXG. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
ixhamza
pushed a commit
to truenas/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2025
Since we are calculating a free space fragmentation, we should weight metaslabs by the amount of their free space, not a full size. Fragmentation of full metaslabs may not matter in presence empty ones. The old algorithm did not differentiate metaslabs having only one free 4KB block from metaslabs having 50% of space free in 4KB blocks, reporting higher fragmentation. While there, move metaslab_group_alloc_update() call after setting mg_fragmentation, otherwise the effect may be delayed by one TXG. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
ixhamza
pushed a commit
to ixhamza/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2025
Since we are calculating a free space fragmentation, we should weight metaslabs by the amount of their free space, not a full size. Fragmentation of full metaslabs may not matter in presence empty ones. The old algorithm did not differentiate metaslabs having only one free 4KB block from metaslabs having 50% of space free in 4KB blocks, reporting higher fragmentation. While there, move metaslab_group_alloc_update() call after setting mg_fragmentation, otherwise the effect may be delayed by one TXG. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
lundman
pushed a commit
to openzfsonosx/openzfs-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 2, 2025
Since we are calculating a free space fragmentation, we should weight metaslabs by the amount of their free space, not a full size. Fragmentation of full metaslabs may not matter in presence empty ones. The old algorithm did not differentiate metaslabs having only one free 4KB block from metaslabs having 50% of space free in 4KB blocks, reporting higher fragmentation. While there, move metaslab_group_alloc_update() call after setting mg_fragmentation, otherwise the effect may be delayed by one TXG. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
lundman
pushed a commit
to openzfsonosx/openzfs-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 2, 2025
Since we are calculating a free space fragmentation, we should weight metaslabs by the amount of their free space, not a full size. Fragmentation of full metaslabs may not matter in presence empty ones. The old algorithm did not differentiate metaslabs having only one free 4KB block from metaslabs having 50% of space free in 4KB blocks, reporting higher fragmentation. While there, move metaslab_group_alloc_update() call after setting mg_fragmentation, otherwise the effect may be delayed by one TXG. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Reviewed-by: Paul Dagnelie <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tony Hutter <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since we are calculating a free space fragmentation, we should weight metaslabs by the amount of their free space, not a full size. Fragmentation of full metaslabs may not matter in presence empty ones. The old algorithm did not differentiate metaslabs having only one free 4KB block from metaslabs having 50% of space free in 4KB blocks, reporting higher fragmentation.
While there, move metaslab_group_alloc_update() call after setting mg_fragmentation, otherwise the effect may be delayed by one TXG.
How Has This Been Tested?
Sequentially filled half of metaslabs to almost full, leaving half almost empty, and observed incorrect 8% fragmentation. Applied the patch and saw the proper 0%. Randomly overwritten the data and observed that fragmentation shown actual 10% due to plenty of small holes.
Types of changes
Checklist:
Signed-off-by
.