act_ct: Fix enum order to keep compatibility #2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Put the following enums at the end instead of in the middle: TCA_CONNTRACK_NAT, TCA_CONNTRACK_NAT_SRC, TCA_CONNTRACK_NAT_DST, TCA_CONNTRACK_NAT_IP_MIN, TCA_CONNTRACK_NAT_IP_MAX, TCA_CONNTRACK_NAT_PORT_MIN, TCA_CONNTRACK_NAT_PORT_MAX, So kernels without nat can still work with updated ovs. Fixes 14141ed("net/sched: act_ct: Add NAT support") Signed-off-by: Chris Mi <[email protected]>
roidayan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2019
[ Upstream commit a843dc4 ] In func check_6rd,tunnel->ip6rd.relay_prefixlen may equal to 32,so UBSAN complain about it. UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in net/ipv6/sit.c:781:47 shift exponent 32 is too large for 32-bit type 'unsigned int' CPU: 6 PID: 20036 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 4.19.27 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0xca/0x13e lib/dump_stack.c:113 ubsan_epilogue+0xe/0x81 lib/ubsan.c:159 __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x293/0x2e8 lib/ubsan.c:425 check_6rd.constprop.9+0x433/0x4e0 net/ipv6/sit.c:781 try_6rd net/ipv6/sit.c:806 [inline] ipip6_tunnel_xmit net/ipv6/sit.c:866 [inline] sit_tunnel_xmit+0x141c/0x2720 net/ipv6/sit.c:1033 __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4300 [inline] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4309 [inline] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3243 [inline] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x17c/0x780 net/core/dev.c:3259 __dev_queue_xmit+0x1656/0x2500 net/core/dev.c:3829 neigh_output include/net/neighbour.h:501 [inline] ip6_finish_output2+0xa36/0x2290 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:120 ip6_finish_output+0x3e7/0xa20 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:154 NF_HOOK_COND include/linux/netfilter.h:278 [inline] ip6_output+0x1e2/0x720 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:171 dst_output include/net/dst.h:444 [inline] ip6_local_out+0x99/0x170 net/ipv6/output_core.c:176 ip6_send_skb+0x9d/0x2f0 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1697 ip6_push_pending_frames+0xc0/0x100 net/ipv6/ip6_output.c:1717 rawv6_push_pending_frames net/ipv6/raw.c:616 [inline] rawv6_sendmsg+0x2435/0x3530 net/ipv6/raw.c:946 inet_sendmsg+0xf8/0x5c0 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:798 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:621 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xc8/0x110 net/socket.c:631 ___sys_sendmsg+0x6cf/0x890 net/socket.c:2114 __sys_sendmsg+0xf0/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2152 do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x580 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Signed-off-by: linmiaohe <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
roidayan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2021
Static analysis reports this problem
write.c:773:29: warning: Assigned value is garbage or undefined
mapping->writeback_index = next;
^ ~~~~
The call to afs_writepages_region() can return without setting
next. So check the function return before using next.
Changes:
ver #2:
- Need to fix the range_cyclic case also[1].
Fixes: e87b03f ("afs: Prepare for use of THPs")
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <[email protected]>
cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAB9dFdvHsLsw7CMnB+4cgciWDSqVjuij4mH3TaXnHQB8sz5rHw@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162609464716.3133237.10354897554363093252.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162610727640.3408253.8687445613469681311.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2
roidayan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2021
Shuyi Cheng says: ==================== This patch set adds the ability to point to a custom BTF for the purposes of BPF CO-RE relocations. This is useful for using BPF CO-RE on old kernels that don't yet natively support kernel (vmlinux) BTF and thus libbpf needs application's help in locating kernel BTF generated separately from the kernel itself. This was already possible to do through bpf_object__load's attribute struct, but that makes it inconvenient to use with BPF skeleton, which only allows to specify bpf_object_open_opts during the open step. Thus, add the ability to override vmlinux BTF at open time. Patch #1 adds libbpf changes. Patch #2 fixes pre-existing memory leak detected during the code review. Patch #3 switches existing selftests to using open_opts for custom BTF. Changelog: ---------- v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzY2cdT44bfbMus=gei27ViqGE1BtGo6XrErSsOCnqtVJg@mail.gmail.com/T/#m877eed1d4cf0a1d3352d3f3d6c5ff158be45c542 v3->v4: - Follow Andrii's suggestion to modify cover letter description. - Delete function bpf_object__load_override_btf. - Follow Dan's suggestion to add fixes tag and modify commit msg to patch #2. - Add pathch #3 to switch existing selftests to using open_opts. v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4Bza_ua+tjxdhyy4nZ8Boeo+scipWmr_1xM1pC6N5wyuhAA@mail.gmail.com/T/#mf9cf86ae0ffa96180ac29e4fd12697eb70eccd0f v2->v3: - Load the BTF specified by btf_custom_path to btf_vmlinux_override instead of btf_bmlinux. - Fix the memory leak that may be introduced by the second version of the patch. - Add a new patch to fix the possible memory leak caused by obj->kconfig. v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzaGjEC4t1OefDo11pj2-HfNy0BLhs_G2UREjRNTmb2u=A@mail.gmail.com/t/#m4d9f7c6761fbd2b436b5dfe491cd864b70225804 v1->v2: - Change custom_btf_path to btf_custom_path. - If the length of btf_custom_path of bpf_obj_open_opts is too long, return ERR_PTR(-ENAMETOOLONG). - Add `custom BTF is in addition to vmlinux BTF` with btf_custom_path field. ==================== Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
roidayan
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2021
At btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() we call btrfs_find_all_roots() with a NULL value as the transaction handle argument, which makes that function take the commit_root_sem semaphore, which is necessary when we don't hold a transaction handle or any other mechanism to prevent a transaction commit from wiping out commit roots. However btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() can be called in a context where we are holding a write lock on an extent buffer from a subvolume tree, namely from btrfs_truncate_inode_items(), called either during truncate or unlink operations. In this case we end up with a lock inversion problem because the commit_root_sem is a higher level lock, always supposed to be acquired before locking any extent buffer. Lockdep detects this lock inversion problem since we switched the extent buffer locks from custom locks to semaphores, and when running btrfs/158 from fstests, it reported the following trace: [ 9057.626435] ====================================================== [ 9057.627541] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 9057.628334] 5.14.0-rc2-btrfs-next-93 #1 Not tainted [ 9057.628961] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 9057.629867] kworker/u16:4/30781 is trying to acquire lock: [ 9057.630824] ffff8e2590f58760 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 9057.632542] but task is already holding lock: [ 9057.633551] ffff8e25582d4b70 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_extent_inodes+0x10b/0x280 [btrfs] [ 9057.635255] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 9057.636292] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 9057.637240] -> #1 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 9057.638138] down_read+0x46/0x140 [ 9057.638648] btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 [btrfs] [ 9057.639398] btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x37/0x70 [btrfs] [ 9057.640283] btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x418/0x490 [btrfs] [ 9057.641114] btrfs_free_extent+0x35/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 9057.641819] btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0x424/0xf70 [btrfs] [ 9057.642643] btrfs_evict_inode+0x454/0x4f0 [btrfs] [ 9057.643418] evict+0xcf/0x1d0 [ 9057.643895] do_unlinkat+0x1e9/0x300 [ 9057.644525] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 9057.645110] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 9057.645835] -> #0 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: [ 9057.646600] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 9057.647248] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 9057.647773] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140 [ 9057.648350] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 9057.649175] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs] [ 9057.650010] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 9057.650849] scrub_print_warning_inode+0x89/0x370 [btrfs] [ 9057.651733] iterate_extent_inodes+0x1e3/0x280 [btrfs] [ 9057.652501] scrub_print_warning+0x15d/0x2f0 [btrfs] [ 9057.653264] scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x135f/0x1640 [btrfs] [ 9057.654295] scrub_bio_end_io_worker+0x101/0x2e0 [btrfs] [ 9057.655111] btrfs_work_helper+0xf8/0x400 [btrfs] [ 9057.655831] process_one_work+0x247/0x5a0 [ 9057.656425] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 [ 9057.656993] kthread+0x155/0x180 [ 9057.657494] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 9057.658030] other info that might help us debug this: [ 9057.659064] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 9057.659824] CPU0 CPU1 [ 9057.660402] ---- ---- [ 9057.660988] lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); [ 9057.661581] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [ 9057.662348] lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); [ 9057.663254] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [ 9057.663690] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 9057.664437] 4 locks held by kworker/u16:4/30781: [ 9057.665023] #0: ffff8e25922a1148 ((wq_completion)btrfs-scrub){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c7/0x5a0 [ 9057.666260] #1: ffffabb3451ffe70 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c7/0x5a0 [ 9057.667639] #2: ffff8e25922da198 (&ret->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x5d2/0x1640 [btrfs] [ 9057.669017] #3: ffff8e25582d4b70 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_extent_inodes+0x10b/0x280 [btrfs] [ 9057.670408] stack backtrace: [ 9057.670976] CPU: 7 PID: 30781 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-btrfs-next-93 #1 [ 9057.672030] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 9057.673492] Workqueue: btrfs-scrub btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [ 9057.674258] Call Trace: [ 9057.674588] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 [ 9057.675083] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 [ 9057.675611] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 9057.676132] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 9057.676605] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 9057.677313] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140 [ 9057.677849] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140 [ 9057.678349] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 9057.679068] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 9057.679760] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs] [ 9057.680458] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 9057.681083] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [ 9057.681594] ? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x11f/0x140 [btrfs] [ 9057.682336] scrub_print_warning_inode+0x89/0x370 [btrfs] [ 9057.683058] ? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x11f/0x140 [btrfs] [ 9057.683834] ? scrub_write_block_to_dev_replace+0xb0/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 9057.684632] iterate_extent_inodes+0x1e3/0x280 [btrfs] [ 9057.685316] scrub_print_warning+0x15d/0x2f0 [btrfs] [ 9057.685977] ? ___ratelimit+0xa4/0x110 [ 9057.686460] scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x135f/0x1640 [btrfs] [ 9057.687316] scrub_bio_end_io_worker+0x101/0x2e0 [btrfs] [ 9057.688021] btrfs_work_helper+0xf8/0x400 [btrfs] [ 9057.688649] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140 [ 9057.689180] process_one_work+0x247/0x5a0 [ 9057.689696] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 [ 9057.690175] ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0 [ 9057.690731] kthread+0x155/0x180 [ 9057.691158] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [ 9057.691697] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Fix this by making btrfs_find_all_roots() never attempt to lock the commit_root_sem when it is called from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post(). We can't just pass a non-NULL transaction handle to btrfs_find_all_roots() from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post(), because that would make backref lookup not use commit roots and acquire read locks on extent buffers, and therefore could deadlock when btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() is called from the btrfs_truncate_inode_items() code path which has acquired a write lock on an extent buffer of the subvolume btree. CC: [email protected] # 4.19+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Put the following enums at the end instead of in the middle:
So kernels without nat can still work with updated ovs.
Fixes 14141ed("net/sched: act_ct: Add NAT support")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mi [email protected]