Skip to content

test(k8s): reorder CheckDestroy #2227

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2023

Conversation

Mia-Cross
Copy link
Contributor

@Mia-Cross Mia-Cross commented Nov 13, 2023

In an attempt to fix the random deletion errors in the nightly tests, we should declare the CheckDestroy functions in the order they should be called.

Also TestAccScalewayK8SCluster_PoolPrivateNetwork serves no purpose now that all clusters must have a private network.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (40d06c4) 73.27% compared to head (97138d3) 73.27%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2227   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.27%   73.27%           
=======================================
  Files         213      213           
  Lines       33753    33753           
=======================================
  Hits        24734    24734           
  Misses       6893     6893           
  Partials     2126     2126           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Mia-Cross Mia-Cross force-pushed the k8s_tests_reorder_sweepers branch from 97138d3 to 685300d Compare November 13, 2023 15:49
@Mia-Cross Mia-Cross changed the title test(k8s): reorder sweepers test(k8s): reorder CheckDestroy Nov 13, 2023
@remyleone remyleone added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 15, 2023
Merged via the queue into scaleway:master with commit 6f0facc Nov 15, 2023
@Mia-Cross Mia-Cross deleted the k8s_tests_reorder_sweepers branch March 13, 2024 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants