Skip to content

Introduce WebMvc.fn #22540

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 20, 2019
Merged

Introduce WebMvc.fn #22540

merged 5 commits into from
Mar 20, 2019

Conversation

poutsma
Copy link
Contributor

@poutsma poutsma commented Mar 7, 2019

This PR introduces Servlet.fn, a servlet-based version of HandlerFunctions and RouterFunctions.

To make it easier to review, I've split the PR into four commits:

  1. the introduction of the core framework
  2. tests
  3. integration with DispatcherServlet and configuration
  4. some polishing on related files

I will set up a meeting for the review.

poutsma added 5 commits March 20, 2019 16:47
This commit introduces Servlet.fn, a servlet-based version of
WebFlux.fn, i.e. HandlerFunctions and RouterFunctions.

This commit contains the web framework only, further commits provide
tests and DispatcherServlet integration.

See spring-projectsgh-21490
This commit adds tests for Servlet.fn, the servlet-based version of
HandlerFunctions and RouterFunctions.

See spring-projectsgh-21490
This commit adds support for HandlerFunctions and RouterFunctions to
DispatcherServlet, in the form of a HandlerAdapter and HandlerMapping.

See spring-projectsgh-21490
This commit incoporates the remarks made during the Servlet.fn review.

See spring-projectsgh-21490
@poutsma poutsma merged commit 0e9ea2c into spring-projects:master Mar 20, 2019
@poutsma poutsma deleted the SPR-16952 branch March 22, 2019 08:46
@rstoyanchev rstoyanchev changed the title Introduce Servlet.fn Introduce WebMvc.fn Apr 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants