Remove 0x0c control character #327

yingzm · 2016-09-26T12:17:30Z

There is two 0x0c(form feed, new page) control characters around function apecs_pci_tbi.
Don't know why, not a problem for compiler, just not feel good.

remove selections of inexistent configs

WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#250: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4554: + {$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#251: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4555: + .name = "cpu.pressure",$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#251: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4555: + .name = "cpu.pressure",$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#252: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4556: + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#252: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4556: + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#253: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4557: + .seq_show = cgroup_cpu_pressure_show,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#253: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4557: + .seq_show = cgroup_cpu_pressure_show,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#254: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4558: + },$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#255: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4559: + {$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#256: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4560: + .name = "memory.pressure",$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#256: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4560: + .name = "memory.pressure",$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#257: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4561: + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#257: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4561: + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#258: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4562: + .seq_show = cgroup_memory_pressure_show,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#258: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4562: + .seq_show = cgroup_memory_pressure_show,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#259: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4563: + },$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#260: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4564: + {$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#261: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4565: + .name = "io.pressure",$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#261: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4565: + .name = "io.pressure",$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#262: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4566: + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#262: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4566: + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#263: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4567: + .seq_show = cgroup_io_pressure_show,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#263: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4567: + .seq_show = cgroup_io_pressure_show,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#264: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4568: + },$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#322: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:424: + cgroup = task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp;$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#323: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:425: + while (cgroup && (parent = cgroup_parent(cgroup))) {$ WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (7, 15) torvalds#323: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:425: + while (cgroup && (parent = cgroup_parent(cgroup))) { + struct psi_group *group; ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#324: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:426: + struct psi_group *group;$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#324: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:426: + struct psi_group *group;$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#326: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:428: + group = cgroup_psi(cgroup);$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#326: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:428: + group = cgroup_psi(cgroup);$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#327: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:429: + psi_group_change(group, cpu, now, clear, set);$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#327: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:429: + psi_group_change(group, cpu, now, clear, set);$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#329: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:431: + cgroup = parent;$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#329: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:431: + cgroup = parent;$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#330: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:432: + }$ WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for any arm of this statement torvalds#378: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:537: + if (task_on_rq_queued(task)) { [...] + } else if (task->in_iowait) { [...] total: 13 errors, 24 warnings, 334 lines checked NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. NOTE: Whitespace errors detected. You may wish to use scripts/cleanpatch or scripts/cleanfile ./patches/psi-cgroup-support.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>

…o undefined SW FP routines arch/x86/Makefile disables SSE and SSE2 for the whole kernel. The AMDGPU drivers modified in this patch re-enable SSE but not SSE2. Turn on SSE2 to support emitting double precision floating point instructions rather than calls to non-existent (usually available from gcc_s or compiler_rt) floating point helper routines. Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Soft-float-library-routines.html Link: ClangBuiltLinux#327 Cc: [email protected] # 4.19 Reported-by: S, Shirish <[email protected]> Reported-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]> Suggested-by: James Y Knight <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <[email protected]> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]> Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> [added CONFIG_CC_IS_CLANG] Link: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109487 Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <[email protected]>

Since commit '62240a88004b ("PCI: rockchip: Drop storing driver private outbound resource data)' the offset calculation is wrong to access the register number to program the IO outbound ATU. The offset should be based on the IORESOURCE_MEM resource size instead of the IORESOURCE_IO size. This patch fixes the following 'synchronous external abort' bug: [ 15.362128] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) [ 15.369655] mwifiex_pcie: PCI memory map Virt0: 00000000a573ad00 PCI memory map Virt2: 00000000783126c4 [ 15.381466] Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 15.389965] Modules linked in: mwifiex_pcie(+) mwifiex uvcvideo cfg80211 atmel_mxt_ts videobuf2_vmalloc ... [ 15.461095] CPU: 2 PID: 269 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.4.0+ torvalds#327 [ 15.461097] Hardware name: Google Kevin (DT) [ 15.461101] pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO) [ 15.461116] pc : mwifiex_register_dev+0x264/0x3f8 [mwifiex_pcie] [ 15.461121] lr : mwifiex_register_dev+0x150/0x3f8 [mwifiex_pcie] [ 15.461123] sp : ffff800012073860 [ 15.461128] x29: ffff800012073860 x28: ffff8000100a2e28 [ 15.509043] x27: ffff8000118b6210 x26: ffff800008f57458 [ 15.515055] x25: ffff0000ecfda000 x24: 0000000000000001 [ 15.521069] x23: ffff0000e9905080 x22: ffff800008f5d000 [ 15.527082] x21: ffff0000eecea078 x20: ffff0000e9905080 [ 15.533096] x19: ffff0000eecea000 x18: 0000000000000001 [ 15.539108] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 15.545118] x15: ffffffffffffffff x14: ffff8000118998c8 [ 15.551128] x13: ffff000000000000 x12: 0000000000000008 [ 15.557138] x11: 0101010101010101 x10: ffff7f7fffff7fff [ 15.563148] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff0000e3c24240 [ 15.569159] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0000e3c24148 [ 15.575169] x5 : ffff0000e3c24148 x4 : ffff0000e7975ec8 [ 15.581178] x3 : 0000000000000001 x2 : 0000000000002b42 [ 15.587188] x1 : ffff800012c00008 x0 : ffff0000e9905080 [ 15.593200] Call trace: [ 15.595970] mwifiex_register_dev+0x264/0x3f8 [mwifiex_pcie] [ 15.602398] mwifiex_add_card+0x2f8/0x430 [mwifiex] [ 15.607920] mwifiex_pcie_probe+0x98/0x148 [mwifiex_pcie] [ 15.614033] local_pci_probe+0x3c/0xa0 [ 15.618275] pci_device_probe+0x110/0x1a8 [ 15.622812] really_probe+0xd4/0x308 [ 15.626856] driver_probe_device+0x54/0xe8 [ 15.631491] device_driver_attach+0x6c/0x78 [ 15.636224] __driver_attach+0x54/0xd0 [ 15.640465] bus_for_each_dev+0x70/0xc0 [ 15.644804] driver_attach+0x20/0x28 [ 15.648847] bus_add_driver+0x178/0x1d8 [ 15.653186] driver_register+0x60/0x110 [ 15.657525] __pci_register_driver+0x40/0x48 [ 15.662359] mwifiex_pcie_init+0x24/0x1000 [mwifiex_pcie] [ 15.668469] do_one_initcall+0x74/0x1a8 [ 15.672810] do_init_module+0x50/0x208 [ 15.677050] load_module+0x1a78/0x1d18 [ 15.681290] __do_sys_finit_module+0xd0/0xe8 [ 15.686120] __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x1c/0x28 [ 15.691247] el0_svc_common.constprop.2+0x88/0x150 [ 15.696668] el0_svc_handler+0x20/0x80 [ 15.700909] el0_sync_handler+0x118/0x188 [ 15.705444] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 15.716955] Code: a8c67bfd d65f03c0 f942ac01 91002021 (b9400021) [ 15.731548] ---[ end trace 1488ca6d6b162849 ]--- Fixes: 62240a8 ("PCI: rockchip: Drop storing driver private outbound resource data) Reported-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]>

Since 62240a8 ("PCI: rockchip: Drop storing driver private outbound resource data), the offset calculation is wrong to access the register number to program the IO outbound ATU. Fix this by computing the ATU IO register number based on the number of MEM registers, not the size of the IO region. This causes 'synchronous external aborts' like the following: mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) mwifiex_pcie: PCI memory map Virt0: 00000000a573ad00 PCI memory map Virt2: 00000000783126c4 Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: mwifiex_pcie(+) mwifiex uvcvideo cfg80211 atmel_mxt_ts videobuf2_vmalloc ... CPU: 2 PID: 269 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.4.0+ torvalds#327 Hardware name: Google Kevin (DT) pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO) pc : mwifiex_register_dev+0x264/0x3f8 [mwifiex_pcie] lr : mwifiex_register_dev+0x150/0x3f8 [mwifiex_pcie] sp : ffff800012073860 x29: ffff800012073860 x28: ffff8000100a2e28 x27: ffff8000118b6210 x26: ffff800008f57458 x25: ffff0000ecfda000 x24: 0000000000000001 x23: ffff0000e9905080 x22: ffff800008f5d000 x21: ffff0000eecea078 x20: ffff0000e9905080 x19: ffff0000eecea000 x18: 0000000000000001 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffffffffffffffff x14: ffff8000118998c8 x13: ffff000000000000 x12: 0000000000000008 x11: 0101010101010101 x10: ffff7f7fffff7fff x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff0000e3c24240 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0000e3c24148 x5 : ffff0000e3c24148 x4 : ffff0000e7975ec8 x3 : 0000000000000001 x2 : 0000000000002b42 x1 : ffff800012c00008 x0 : ffff0000e9905080 Call trace: mwifiex_register_dev+0x264/0x3f8 [mwifiex_pcie] mwifiex_add_card+0x2f8/0x430 [mwifiex] mwifiex_pcie_probe+0x98/0x148 [mwifiex_pcie] pci_device_probe+0x110/0x1a8 ... Code: a8c67bfd d65f03c0 f942ac01 91002021 (b9400021) Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]> Fixes: 62240a8 ("PCI: rockchip: Drop storing driver private outbound resource data) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reported-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andrew Murray <[email protected]>

Since 62240a8 ("PCI: rockchip: Drop storing driver private outbound resource data), the offset calculation is wrong to access the register number to program the IO outbound ATU. Fix this by computing the ATU IO register number based on the number of MEM registers, not the size of the IO region. This causes 'synchronous external aborts' like the following: mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) mwifiex_pcie: PCI memory map Virt0: 00000000a573ad00 PCI memory map Virt2: 00000000783126c4 Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: mwifiex_pcie(+) mwifiex uvcvideo cfg80211 atmel_mxt_ts videobuf2_vmalloc ... CPU: 2 PID: 269 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.4.0+ #327 Hardware name: Google Kevin (DT) pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO) pc : mwifiex_register_dev+0x264/0x3f8 [mwifiex_pcie] lr : mwifiex_register_dev+0x150/0x3f8 [mwifiex_pcie] sp : ffff800012073860 x29: ffff800012073860 x28: ffff8000100a2e28 x27: ffff8000118b6210 x26: ffff800008f57458 x25: ffff0000ecfda000 x24: 0000000000000001 x23: ffff0000e9905080 x22: ffff800008f5d000 x21: ffff0000eecea078 x20: ffff0000e9905080 x19: ffff0000eecea000 x18: 0000000000000001 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffffffffffffffff x14: ffff8000118998c8 x13: ffff000000000000 x12: 0000000000000008 x11: 0101010101010101 x10: ffff7f7fffff7fff x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff0000e3c24240 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0000e3c24148 x5 : ffff0000e3c24148 x4 : ffff0000e7975ec8 x3 : 0000000000000001 x2 : 0000000000002b42 x1 : ffff800012c00008 x0 : ffff0000e9905080 Call trace: mwifiex_register_dev+0x264/0x3f8 [mwifiex_pcie] mwifiex_add_card+0x2f8/0x430 [mwifiex] mwifiex_pcie_probe+0x98/0x148 [mwifiex_pcie] pci_device_probe+0x110/0x1a8 ... Code: a8c67bfd d65f03c0 f942ac01 91002021 (b9400021) Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]> Fixes: 62240a8 ("PCI: rockchip: Drop storing driver private outbound resource data) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reported-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Reported-by: Vicente Bergas <[email protected]> Tested-by: Vicente Bergas <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andrew Murray <[email protected]>

Since 62240a8 ("PCI: rockchip: Drop storing driver private outbound resource data), the offset calculation is wrong to access the register number to program the IO outbound ATU. Fix this by computing the ATU IO register number based on the number of MEM registers, not the size of the IO region. This causes 'synchronous external aborts' like the following: mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002) mwifiex_pcie: PCI memory map Virt0: 00000000a573ad00 PCI memory map Virt2: 00000000783126c4 Internal error: synchronous external abort: 96000210 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: mwifiex_pcie(+) mwifiex uvcvideo cfg80211 atmel_mxt_ts videobuf2_vmalloc ... CPU: 2 PID: 269 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.4.0+ torvalds#327 Hardware name: Google Kevin (DT) pstate: 60000005 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO) pc : mwifiex_register_dev+0x264/0x3f8 [mwifiex_pcie] lr : mwifiex_register_dev+0x150/0x3f8 [mwifiex_pcie] sp : ffff800012073860 x29: ffff800012073860 x28: ffff8000100a2e28 x27: ffff8000118b6210 x26: ffff800008f57458 x25: ffff0000ecfda000 x24: 0000000000000001 x23: ffff0000e9905080 x22: ffff800008f5d000 x21: ffff0000eecea078 x20: ffff0000e9905080 x19: ffff0000eecea000 x18: 0000000000000001 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffffffffffffffff x14: ffff8000118998c8 x13: ffff000000000000 x12: 0000000000000008 x11: 0101010101010101 x10: ffff7f7fffff7fff x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : ffff0000e3c24240 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0000e3c24148 x5 : ffff0000e3c24148 x4 : ffff0000e7975ec8 x3 : 0000000000000001 x2 : 0000000000002b42 x1 : ffff800012c00008 x0 : ffff0000e9905080 Call trace: mwifiex_register_dev+0x264/0x3f8 [mwifiex_pcie] mwifiex_add_card+0x2f8/0x430 [mwifiex] mwifiex_pcie_probe+0x98/0x148 [mwifiex_pcie] pci_device_probe+0x110/0x1a8 ... Code: a8c67bfd d65f03c0 f942ac01 91002021 (b9400021) Suggested-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <[email protected]> Fixes: 62240a8 ("PCI: rockchip: Drop storing driver private outbound resource data) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reported-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Reported-by: Vicente Bergas <[email protected]> Tested-by: Vicente Bergas <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andrew Murray <[email protected]>

This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#285: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:285: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#287: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:287: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#289: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:289: +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#291: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:291: +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#305: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:305: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#309: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:309: +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#311: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:311: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#313: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:313: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#315: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:315: +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#323: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:323: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#325: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:325: +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#327: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:327: +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:330: +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#338: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:338: +void odm_InitHybridAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#341: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:341: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#349: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:349: +void odm_SetRxIdleAnt(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u8 Ant, bool bDualPath); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#353: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:353: +void odm_HwAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#363: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:363: +void ODM_DMInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#393: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:393: +void ODM_DMWatchdog(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#420: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:420: + struct DIG_T * pDM_DigTable = &pDM_Odm->DM_DigTable; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#448: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:448: +void ODM_CmnInfoInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, u32 Value) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#560: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:560: +void ODM_CmnInfoHook(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, void *pValue) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#689: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:689: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#717: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:717: +void ODM_CmnInfoUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u32 CmnInfo, u64 Value) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#831: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:831: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#841: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:841: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#867: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:867: +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#888: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:888: +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#935: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:935: +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#937: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:937: + struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pOdmRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#953: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:953: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1083: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1083: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1094: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1094: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1131: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1131: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1137: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1137: + struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1196: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1196: +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1198: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1198: + struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1204: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1204: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1217: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1217: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm = &(pHalData->odmpriv); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1234: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1234: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1243: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1243: + struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1306: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1306: +static u8 getSwingIndex(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1330: +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1374: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1374: +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1398: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1398: +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1400: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1400: + struct SWAT_T * pDM_SWAT_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_SWAT_Table; Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <[email protected]>

This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#285: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:285: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#287: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:287: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#289: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:289: +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#291: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:291: +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#305: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:305: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#309: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:309: +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#311: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:311: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#313: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:313: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#315: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:315: +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#323: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:323: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#325: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:325: +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#327: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:327: +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:330: +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#338: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:338: +void odm_InitHybridAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#341: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:341: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#349: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:349: +void odm_SetRxIdleAnt(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u8 Ant, bool bDualPath); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#353: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:353: +void odm_HwAntDiv(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#363: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:363: +void ODM_DMInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#393: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:393: +void ODM_DMWatchdog(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#420: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:420: + struct DIG_T * pDM_DigTable = &pDM_Odm->DM_DigTable; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#448: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:448: +void ODM_CmnInfoInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, u32 Value) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#560: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:560: +void ODM_CmnInfoHook(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, enum ODM_CMNINFO_E CmnInfo, void *pValue) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#689: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:689: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#717: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:717: +void ODM_CmnInfoUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, u32 CmnInfo, u64 Value) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#831: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:831: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#841: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:841: +void odm_CommonInfoSelfUpdate(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#867: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:867: +void odm_CmnInfoInit_Debug(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#888: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:888: +void odm_BasicDbgMessage(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#935: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:935: +void odm_RateAdaptiveMaskInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#937: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:937: + struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pOdmRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#953: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:953: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1083: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1083: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMask(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1094: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1094: +void odm_RefreshRateAdaptiveMaskCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1131: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1131: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1137: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1137: + struct ODM_RATE_ADAPTIVE * pRA = &pDM_Odm->RateAdaptive; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1196: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1196: +void odm_RSSIMonitorInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1198: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1198: + struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1204: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1204: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1217: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1217: + struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm = &(pHalData->odmpriv); ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1234: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1234: +void odm_RSSIMonitorCheckCE(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1243: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1243: + struct RA_T * pRA_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_RA_Table; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1306: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1306: +static u8 getSwingIndex(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1330: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1330: +void odm_TXPowerTrackingInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1374: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1374: +void ODM_TXPowerTrackingCheck(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1398: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1398: +void odm_SwAntDetectInit(struct DM_ODM_T * pDM_Odm) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1400: FILE: ./hal/odm.c:1400: + struct SWAT_T * pDM_SWAT_Table = &pDM_Odm->DM_SWAT_Table; Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

Patch to fix sound on ASUS Zenbook S 13 OLED laptop model UM5302TA

Yi Lai reported an issue ([1]) where the following warning appears in kernel dmesg: [ 60.643604] verifier backtracking bug [ 60.643635] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 2315 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4302 __mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10 [ 60.648428] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [ 60.650471] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 2315 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G OE 6.15.0-rc4-gef11287f8289-dirty torvalds#327 PREEMPT(full) [ 60.654385] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [ 60.656682] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 60.660475] RIP: 0010:__mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10 [ 60.662814] Code: 5a 30 84 89 ea e8 c4 d9 01 00 80 3d 3e 7d d8 04 00 0f 85 60 fa ff ff c6 05 31 7d d8 04 01 48 c7 c7 00 58 30 84 e8 c4 06 a5 ff <0f> 0b e9 46 fa ff ff 48 ... [ 60.668720] RSP: 0018:ffff888116cc7298 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 60.671075] RAX: 54d70e82dfd31900 RBX: ffff888115b65e20 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 60.673659] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [ 60.676241] RBP: 0000000000000400 R08: ffff8881f6f23bd3 R09: 1ffff1103ede477a [ 60.678787] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed103ede477b R12: ffff888115b60ae8 [ 60.681420] R13: 1ffff11022b6cbc4 R14: 00000000fffffff2 R15: 0000000000000001 [ 60.684030] FS: 00007fc2aedd80c0(0000) GS:ffff88826fa8a000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 60.686837] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 60.689027] CR2: 000056325369e000 CR3: 000000011088b002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [ 60.691623] Call Trace: [ 60.692821] <TASK> [ 60.693960] ? __pfx_verbose+0x10/0x10 [ 60.695656] ? __pfx_disasm_kfunc_name+0x10/0x10 [ 60.697495] check_cond_jmp_op+0x16f7/0x39b0 [ 60.699237] do_check+0x58fa/0xab10 ... Further analysis shows the warning is at line 4302 as below: 4294 /* static subprog call instruction, which 4295 * means that we are exiting current subprog, 4296 * so only r1-r5 could be still requested as 4297 * precise, r0 and r6-r10 or any stack slot in 4298 * the current frame should be zero by now 4299 */ 4300 if (bt_reg_mask(bt) & ~BPF_REGMASK_ARGS) { 4301 verbose(env, "BUG regs %x\n", bt_reg_mask(bt)); 4302 WARN_ONCE(1, "verifier backtracking bug"); 4303 return -EFAULT; 4304 } With the below test (also in the next patch): __used __naked static void __bpf_jmp_r10(void) { asm volatile ( "r2 = 2314885393468386424 ll;" "goto +0;" "if r2 <= r10 goto +3;" "if r1 >= -1835016 goto +0;" "if r2 <= 8 goto +0;" "if r3 <= 0 goto +0;" "exit;" ::: __clobber_all); } SEC("?raw_tp") __naked void bpf_jmp_r10(void) { asm volatile ( "r3 = 0 ll;" "call __bpf_jmp_r10;" "r0 = 0;" "exit;" ::: __clobber_all); } The following is the verifier failure log: 0: (18) r3 = 0x0 ; R3_w=0 2: (85) call pc+2 caller: R10=fp0 callee: frame1: R1=ctx() R3_w=0 R10=fp0 5: frame1: R1=ctx() R3_w=0 R10=fp0 ; asm volatile (" \ @ verifier_precision.c:184 5: (18) r2 = 0x20202000256c6c78 ; frame1: R2_w=0x20202000256c6c78 7: (05) goto pc+0 8: (bd) if r2 <= r10 goto pc+3 ; frame1: R2_w=0x20202000256c6c78 R10=fp0 9: (35) if r1 >= 0xffe3fff8 goto pc+0 ; frame1: R1=ctx() 10: (b5) if r2 <= 0x8 goto pc+0 mark_precise: frame1: last_idx 10 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2 stack= before 9: (35) if r1 >= 0xffe3fff8 goto pc+0 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2 stack= before 8: (bd) if r2 <= r10 goto pc+3 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2,r10 stack= before 7: (05) goto pc+0 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2,r10 stack= before 5: (18) r2 = 0x20202000256c6c78 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r10 stack= before 2: (85) call pc+2 BUG regs 400 The main failure reason is due to r10 in precision backtracking bookkeeping. Actually r10 is always precise and there is no need to add it the precision backtracking bookkeeping. This patch fixed the problem by not adding r10 to prevision backtracking bookkeeping. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Z%2F8q3xzpU59CIYQE@ly-workstation/ Reported by: Yi Lai <[email protected]> Fixes: 407958a ("bpf: encapsulate precision backtracking bookkeeping") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

Yi Lai reported an issue ([1]) where the following warning appears in kernel dmesg: [ 60.643604] verifier backtracking bug [ 60.643635] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 2315 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4302 __mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10 [ 60.648428] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [ 60.650471] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 2315 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G OE 6.15.0-rc4-gef11287f8289-dirty torvalds#327 PREEMPT(full) [ 60.654385] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [ 60.656682] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 60.660475] RIP: 0010:__mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10 [ 60.662814] Code: 5a 30 84 89 ea e8 c4 d9 01 00 80 3d 3e 7d d8 04 00 0f 85 60 fa ff ff c6 05 31 7d d8 04 01 48 c7 c7 00 58 30 84 e8 c4 06 a5 ff <0f> 0b e9 46 fa ff ff 48 ... [ 60.668720] RSP: 0018:ffff888116cc7298 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 60.671075] RAX: 54d70e82dfd31900 RBX: ffff888115b65e20 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 60.673659] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [ 60.676241] RBP: 0000000000000400 R08: ffff8881f6f23bd3 R09: 1ffff1103ede477a [ 60.678787] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed103ede477b R12: ffff888115b60ae8 [ 60.681420] R13: 1ffff11022b6cbc4 R14: 00000000fffffff2 R15: 0000000000000001 [ 60.684030] FS: 00007fc2aedd80c0(0000) GS:ffff88826fa8a000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 60.686837] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 60.689027] CR2: 000056325369e000 CR3: 000000011088b002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [ 60.691623] Call Trace: [ 60.692821] <TASK> [ 60.693960] ? __pfx_verbose+0x10/0x10 [ 60.695656] ? __pfx_disasm_kfunc_name+0x10/0x10 [ 60.697495] check_cond_jmp_op+0x16f7/0x39b0 [ 60.699237] do_check+0x58fa/0xab10 ... Further analysis shows the warning is at line 4302 as below: 4294 /* static subprog call instruction, which 4295 * means that we are exiting current subprog, 4296 * so only r1-r5 could be still requested as 4297 * precise, r0 and r6-r10 or any stack slot in 4298 * the current frame should be zero by now 4299 */ 4300 if (bt_reg_mask(bt) & ~BPF_REGMASK_ARGS) { 4301 verbose(env, "BUG regs %x\n", bt_reg_mask(bt)); 4302 WARN_ONCE(1, "verifier backtracking bug"); 4303 return -EFAULT; 4304 } With the below test (also in the next patch): __used __naked static void __bpf_jmp_r10(void) { asm volatile ( "r2 = 2314885393468386424 ll;" "goto +0;" "if r2 <= r10 goto +3;" "if r1 >= -1835016 goto +0;" "if r2 <= 8 goto +0;" "if r3 <= 0 goto +0;" "exit;" ::: __clobber_all); } SEC("?raw_tp") __naked void bpf_jmp_r10(void) { asm volatile ( "r3 = 0 ll;" "call __bpf_jmp_r10;" "r0 = 0;" "exit;" ::: __clobber_all); } The following is the verifier failure log: 0: (18) r3 = 0x0 ; R3_w=0 2: (85) call pc+2 caller: R10=fp0 callee: frame1: R1=ctx() R3_w=0 R10=fp0 5: frame1: R1=ctx() R3_w=0 R10=fp0 ; asm volatile (" \ @ verifier_precision.c:184 5: (18) r2 = 0x20202000256c6c78 ; frame1: R2_w=0x20202000256c6c78 7: (05) goto pc+0 8: (bd) if r2 <= r10 goto pc+3 ; frame1: R2_w=0x20202000256c6c78 R10=fp0 9: (35) if r1 >= 0xffe3fff8 goto pc+0 ; frame1: R1=ctx() 10: (b5) if r2 <= 0x8 goto pc+0 mark_precise: frame1: last_idx 10 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2 stack= before 9: (35) if r1 >= 0xffe3fff8 goto pc+0 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2 stack= before 8: (bd) if r2 <= r10 goto pc+3 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2,r10 stack= before 7: (05) goto pc+0 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2,r10 stack= before 5: (18) r2 = 0x20202000256c6c78 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r10 stack= before 2: (85) call pc+2 BUG regs 400 The main failure reason is due to r10 in precision backtracking bookkeeping. Actually r10 is always precise and there is no need to add it the precision backtracking bookkeeping. One way to fix the issue is to prevent bt_set_reg() if any src/dst reg is r10. Andrii suggested to go with push_insn_history() approach to avoid explicitly checking r10 in backtrack_insn(). This patch added push_insn_history() support for cond_jmp like 'rX <op> rY' operations. In check_cond_jmp_op(), if any of rX or rY is r10, push_insn_history() will not record that register, and later backtrack_insn() will not do bt_set_reg() for those registers. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Z%2F8q3xzpU59CIYQE@ly-workstation/ Reported by: Yi Lai <[email protected]> Fixes: 407958a ("bpf: encapsulate precision backtracking bookkeeping") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

…keeping Yi Lai reported an issue ([1]) where the following warning appears in kernel dmesg: [ 60.643604] verifier backtracking bug [ 60.643635] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 2315 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4302 __mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10 [ 60.648428] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [ 60.650471] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 2315 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G OE 6.15.0-rc4-gef11287f8289-dirty torvalds#327 PREEMPT(full) [ 60.654385] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [ 60.656682] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 60.660475] RIP: 0010:__mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10 [ 60.662814] Code: 5a 30 84 89 ea e8 c4 d9 01 00 80 3d 3e 7d d8 04 00 0f 85 60 fa ff ff c6 05 31 7d d8 04 01 48 c7 c7 00 58 30 84 e8 c4 06 a5 ff <0f> 0b e9 46 fa ff ff 48 ... [ 60.668720] RSP: 0018:ffff888116cc7298 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 60.671075] RAX: 54d70e82dfd31900 RBX: ffff888115b65e20 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 60.673659] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [ 60.676241] RBP: 0000000000000400 R08: ffff8881f6f23bd3 R09: 1ffff1103ede477a [ 60.678787] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed103ede477b R12: ffff888115b60ae8 [ 60.681420] R13: 1ffff11022b6cbc4 R14: 00000000fffffff2 R15: 0000000000000001 [ 60.684030] FS: 00007fc2aedd80c0(0000) GS:ffff88826fa8a000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 60.686837] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 60.689027] CR2: 000056325369e000 CR3: 000000011088b002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [ 60.691623] Call Trace: [ 60.692821] <TASK> [ 60.693960] ? __pfx_verbose+0x10/0x10 [ 60.695656] ? __pfx_disasm_kfunc_name+0x10/0x10 [ 60.697495] check_cond_jmp_op+0x16f7/0x39b0 [ 60.699237] do_check+0x58fa/0xab10 ... Further analysis shows the warning is at line 4302 as below: 4294 /* static subprog call instruction, which 4295 * means that we are exiting current subprog, 4296 * so only r1-r5 could be still requested as 4297 * precise, r0 and r6-r10 or any stack slot in 4298 * the current frame should be zero by now 4299 */ 4300 if (bt_reg_mask(bt) & ~BPF_REGMASK_ARGS) { 4301 verbose(env, "BUG regs %x\n", bt_reg_mask(bt)); 4302 WARN_ONCE(1, "verifier backtracking bug"); 4303 return -EFAULT; 4304 } With the below test (also in the next patch): __used __naked static void __bpf_jmp_r10(void) { asm volatile ( "r2 = 2314885393468386424 ll;" "goto +0;" "if r2 <= r10 goto +3;" "if r1 >= -1835016 goto +0;" "if r2 <= 8 goto +0;" "if r3 <= 0 goto +0;" "exit;" ::: __clobber_all); } SEC("?raw_tp") __naked void bpf_jmp_r10(void) { asm volatile ( "r3 = 0 ll;" "call __bpf_jmp_r10;" "r0 = 0;" "exit;" ::: __clobber_all); } The following is the verifier failure log: 0: (18) r3 = 0x0 ; R3_w=0 2: (85) call pc+2 caller: R10=fp0 callee: frame1: R1=ctx() R3_w=0 R10=fp0 5: frame1: R1=ctx() R3_w=0 R10=fp0 ; asm volatile (" \ @ verifier_precision.c:184 5: (18) r2 = 0x20202000256c6c78 ; frame1: R2_w=0x20202000256c6c78 7: (05) goto pc+0 8: (bd) if r2 <= r10 goto pc+3 ; frame1: R2_w=0x20202000256c6c78 R10=fp0 9: (35) if r1 >= 0xffe3fff8 goto pc+0 ; frame1: R1=ctx() 10: (b5) if r2 <= 0x8 goto pc+0 mark_precise: frame1: last_idx 10 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2 stack= before 9: (35) if r1 >= 0xffe3fff8 goto pc+0 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2 stack= before 8: (bd) if r2 <= r10 goto pc+3 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2,r10 stack= before 7: (05) goto pc+0 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2,r10 stack= before 5: (18) r2 = 0x20202000256c6c78 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r10 stack= before 2: (85) call pc+2 BUG regs 400 The main failure reason is due to r10 in precision backtracking bookkeeping. Actually r10 is always precise and there is no need to add it for the precision backtracking bookkeeping. One way to fix the issue is to prevent bt_set_reg() if any src/dst reg is r10. Andrii suggested to go with push_insn_history() approach to avoid explicitly checking r10 in backtrack_insn(). This patch added push_insn_history() support for cond_jmp like 'rX <op> rY' operations. In check_cond_jmp_op(), if any of rX or rY is a stack pointer, push_insn_history() will record such information, and later backtrack_insn() will do bt_set_reg() properly for those register(s). [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Z%2F8q3xzpU59CIYQE@ly-workstation/ Reported by: Yi Lai <[email protected]> Fixes: 407958a ("bpf: encapsulate precision backtracking bookkeeping") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>

…keeping Yi Lai reported an issue ([1]) where the following warning appears in kernel dmesg: [ 60.643604] verifier backtracking bug [ 60.643635] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 2315 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4302 __mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10 [ 60.648428] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [ 60.650471] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 2315 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G OE 6.15.0-rc4-gef11287f8289-dirty torvalds#327 PREEMPT(full) [ 60.654385] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [ 60.656682] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 60.660475] RIP: 0010:__mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10 [ 60.662814] Code: 5a 30 84 89 ea e8 c4 d9 01 00 80 3d 3e 7d d8 04 00 0f 85 60 fa ff ff c6 05 31 7d d8 04 01 48 c7 c7 00 58 30 84 e8 c4 06 a5 ff <0f> 0b e9 46 fa ff ff 48 ... [ 60.668720] RSP: 0018:ffff888116cc7298 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 60.671075] RAX: 54d70e82dfd31900 RBX: ffff888115b65e20 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 60.673659] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [ 60.676241] RBP: 0000000000000400 R08: ffff8881f6f23bd3 R09: 1ffff1103ede477a [ 60.678787] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed103ede477b R12: ffff888115b60ae8 [ 60.681420] R13: 1ffff11022b6cbc4 R14: 00000000fffffff2 R15: 0000000000000001 [ 60.684030] FS: 00007fc2aedd80c0(0000) GS:ffff88826fa8a000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 60.686837] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 60.689027] CR2: 000056325369e000 CR3: 000000011088b002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [ 60.691623] Call Trace: [ 60.692821] <TASK> [ 60.693960] ? __pfx_verbose+0x10/0x10 [ 60.695656] ? __pfx_disasm_kfunc_name+0x10/0x10 [ 60.697495] check_cond_jmp_op+0x16f7/0x39b0 [ 60.699237] do_check+0x58fa/0xab10 ... Further analysis shows the warning is at line 4302 as below: 4294 /* static subprog call instruction, which 4295 * means that we are exiting current subprog, 4296 * so only r1-r5 could be still requested as 4297 * precise, r0 and r6-r10 or any stack slot in 4298 * the current frame should be zero by now 4299 */ 4300 if (bt_reg_mask(bt) & ~BPF_REGMASK_ARGS) { 4301 verbose(env, "BUG regs %x\n", bt_reg_mask(bt)); 4302 WARN_ONCE(1, "verifier backtracking bug"); 4303 return -EFAULT; 4304 } With the below test (also in the next patch): __used __naked static void __bpf_jmp_r10(void) { asm volatile ( "r2 = 2314885393468386424 ll;" "goto +0;" "if r2 <= r10 goto +3;" "if r1 >= -1835016 goto +0;" "if r2 <= 8 goto +0;" "if r3 <= 0 goto +0;" "exit;" ::: __clobber_all); } SEC("?raw_tp") __naked void bpf_jmp_r10(void) { asm volatile ( "r3 = 0 ll;" "call __bpf_jmp_r10;" "r0 = 0;" "exit;" ::: __clobber_all); } The following is the verifier failure log: 0: (18) r3 = 0x0 ; R3_w=0 2: (85) call pc+2 caller: R10=fp0 callee: frame1: R1=ctx() R3_w=0 R10=fp0 5: frame1: R1=ctx() R3_w=0 R10=fp0 ; asm volatile (" \ @ verifier_precision.c:184 5: (18) r2 = 0x20202000256c6c78 ; frame1: R2_w=0x20202000256c6c78 7: (05) goto pc+0 8: (bd) if r2 <= r10 goto pc+3 ; frame1: R2_w=0x20202000256c6c78 R10=fp0 9: (35) if r1 >= 0xffe3fff8 goto pc+0 ; frame1: R1=ctx() 10: (b5) if r2 <= 0x8 goto pc+0 mark_precise: frame1: last_idx 10 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2 stack= before 9: (35) if r1 >= 0xffe3fff8 goto pc+0 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2 stack= before 8: (bd) if r2 <= r10 goto pc+3 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2,r10 stack= before 7: (05) goto pc+0 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2,r10 stack= before 5: (18) r2 = 0x20202000256c6c78 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r10 stack= before 2: (85) call pc+2 BUG regs 400 The main failure reason is due to r10 in precision backtracking bookkeeping. Actually r10 is always precise and there is no need to add it for the precision backtracking bookkeeping. One way to fix the issue is to prevent bt_set_reg() if any src/dst reg is r10. Andrii suggested to go with push_insn_history() approach to avoid explicitly checking r10 in backtrack_insn(). This patch added push_insn_history() support for cond_jmp like 'rX <op> rY' operations. In check_cond_jmp_op(), if any of rX or rY is a stack pointer, push_insn_history() will record such information, and later backtrack_insn() will do bt_set_reg() properly for those register(s). [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Z%2F8q3xzpU59CIYQE@ly-workstation/ Reported by: Yi Lai <[email protected]> Fixes: 407958a ("bpf: encapsulate precision backtracking bookkeeping") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]

…keeping [ Upstream commit e2d2115 ] Yi Lai reported an issue ([1]) where the following warning appears in kernel dmesg: [ 60.643604] verifier backtracking bug [ 60.643635] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 2315 at kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4302 __mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10 [ 60.648428] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [ 60.650471] CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 2315 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G OE 6.15.0-rc4-gef11287f8289-dirty torvalds#327 PREEMPT(full) [ 60.654385] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE [ 60.656682] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 60.660475] RIP: 0010:__mark_chain_precision+0x3a6c/0x3e10 [ 60.662814] Code: 5a 30 84 89 ea e8 c4 d9 01 00 80 3d 3e 7d d8 04 00 0f 85 60 fa ff ff c6 05 31 7d d8 04 01 48 c7 c7 00 58 30 84 e8 c4 06 a5 ff <0f> 0b e9 46 fa ff ff 48 ... [ 60.668720] RSP: 0018:ffff888116cc7298 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 60.671075] RAX: 54d70e82dfd31900 RBX: ffff888115b65e20 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 60.673659] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [ 60.676241] RBP: 0000000000000400 R08: ffff8881f6f23bd3 R09: 1ffff1103ede477a [ 60.678787] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed103ede477b R12: ffff888115b60ae8 [ 60.681420] R13: 1ffff11022b6cbc4 R14: 00000000fffffff2 R15: 0000000000000001 [ 60.684030] FS: 00007fc2aedd80c0(0000) GS:ffff88826fa8a000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 60.686837] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 60.689027] CR2: 000056325369e000 CR3: 000000011088b002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [ 60.691623] Call Trace: [ 60.692821] <TASK> [ 60.693960] ? __pfx_verbose+0x10/0x10 [ 60.695656] ? __pfx_disasm_kfunc_name+0x10/0x10 [ 60.697495] check_cond_jmp_op+0x16f7/0x39b0 [ 60.699237] do_check+0x58fa/0xab10 ... Further analysis shows the warning is at line 4302 as below: 4294 /* static subprog call instruction, which 4295 * means that we are exiting current subprog, 4296 * so only r1-r5 could be still requested as 4297 * precise, r0 and r6-r10 or any stack slot in 4298 * the current frame should be zero by now 4299 */ 4300 if (bt_reg_mask(bt) & ~BPF_REGMASK_ARGS) { 4301 verbose(env, "BUG regs %x\n", bt_reg_mask(bt)); 4302 WARN_ONCE(1, "verifier backtracking bug"); 4303 return -EFAULT; 4304 } With the below test (also in the next patch): __used __naked static void __bpf_jmp_r10(void) { asm volatile ( "r2 = 2314885393468386424 ll;" "goto +0;" "if r2 <= r10 goto +3;" "if r1 >= -1835016 goto +0;" "if r2 <= 8 goto +0;" "if r3 <= 0 goto +0;" "exit;" ::: __clobber_all); } SEC("?raw_tp") __naked void bpf_jmp_r10(void) { asm volatile ( "r3 = 0 ll;" "call __bpf_jmp_r10;" "r0 = 0;" "exit;" ::: __clobber_all); } The following is the verifier failure log: 0: (18) r3 = 0x0 ; R3_w=0 2: (85) call pc+2 caller: R10=fp0 callee: frame1: R1=ctx() R3_w=0 R10=fp0 5: frame1: R1=ctx() R3_w=0 R10=fp0 ; asm volatile (" \ @ verifier_precision.c:184 5: (18) r2 = 0x20202000256c6c78 ; frame1: R2_w=0x20202000256c6c78 7: (05) goto pc+0 8: (bd) if r2 <= r10 goto pc+3 ; frame1: R2_w=0x20202000256c6c78 R10=fp0 9: (35) if r1 >= 0xffe3fff8 goto pc+0 ; frame1: R1=ctx() 10: (b5) if r2 <= 0x8 goto pc+0 mark_precise: frame1: last_idx 10 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2 stack= before 9: (35) if r1 >= 0xffe3fff8 goto pc+0 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2 stack= before 8: (bd) if r2 <= r10 goto pc+3 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2,r10 stack= before 7: (05) goto pc+0 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r2,r10 stack= before 5: (18) r2 = 0x20202000256c6c78 mark_precise: frame1: regs=r10 stack= before 2: (85) call pc+2 BUG regs 400 The main failure reason is due to r10 in precision backtracking bookkeeping. Actually r10 is always precise and there is no need to add it for the precision backtracking bookkeeping. One way to fix the issue is to prevent bt_set_reg() if any src/dst reg is r10. Andrii suggested to go with push_insn_history() approach to avoid explicitly checking r10 in backtrack_insn(). This patch added push_insn_history() support for cond_jmp like 'rX <op> rY' operations. In check_cond_jmp_op(), if any of rX or rY is a stack pointer, push_insn_history() will record such information, and later backtrack_insn() will do bt_set_reg() properly for those register(s). [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Z%2F8q3xzpU59CIYQE@ly-workstation/ Reported by: Yi Lai <[email protected]> Fixes: 407958a ("bpf: encapsulate precision backtracking bookkeeping") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

Remove 0x0c control character

44373cf

yingzm closed this Sep 26, 2016

laijs pushed a commit to laijs/linux that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2017

Merge pull request torvalds#327 from laijs/lkl/remove-inexistent-configs

c5d152f

remove selections of inexistent configs

NeroReflex pushed a commit to NeroReflex/linux that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2024

Merge pull request torvalds#327 from vjr/fix-asus-zenbook-um5302ta-sound

2327576

Patch to fix sound on ASUS Zenbook S 13 OLED laptop model UM5302TA

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Remove 0x0c control character #327

Remove 0x0c control character #327

Uh oh!

yingzm commented Sep 26, 2016 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Remove 0x0c control character #327

Remove 0x0c control character #327

Uh oh!

Conversation

yingzm commented Sep 26, 2016 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

yingzm commented Sep 26, 2016 •

edited

Loading