You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
PCI: pciehp: Use down_read/write_nested(reset_lock) to fix lockdep errors
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962230
commit 085a9f4 upstream.
Use down_read_nested() and down_write_nested() when taking the
ctrl->reset_lock rw-sem, passing the number of PCIe hotplug controllers in
the path to the PCI root bus as lock subclass parameter.
This fixes the following false-positive lockdep report when unplugging a
Lenovo X1C8 from a Lenovo 2nd gen TB3 dock:
pcieport 0000:06:01.0: pciehp: Slot(1): Link Down
pcieport 0000:06:01.0: pciehp: Slot(1): Card not present
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.16.0-rc2+ #621 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
irq/124-pciehp/86 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8e5ac4299ef8 (&ctrl->reset_lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: pciehp_check_presence+0x23/0x80
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8e5ac4298af8 (&ctrl->reset_lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: pciehp_ist+0xf3/0x180
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&ctrl->reset_lock);
lock(&ctrl->reset_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by irq/124-pciehp/86:
#0: ffff8e5ac4298af8 (&ctrl->reset_lock){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: pciehp_ist+0xf3/0x180
#1: ffffffffa3b024e8 (pci_rescan_remove_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pciehp_unconfigure_device+0x31/0x110
#2: ffff8e5ac1ee2248 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver+0x1c/0x40
stack backtrace:
CPU: 4 PID: 86 Comm: irq/124-pciehp Not tainted 5.16.0-rc2+ #621
Hardware name: LENOVO 20U90SIT19/20U90SIT19, BIOS N2WET30W (1.20 ) 08/26/2021
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x59/0x73
__lock_acquire.cold+0xc5/0x2c6
lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
down_read+0x3e/0x50
pciehp_check_presence+0x23/0x80
pciehp_runtime_resume+0x5c/0xa0
device_for_each_child+0x45/0x70
pcie_port_device_runtime_resume+0x20/0x30
pci_pm_runtime_resume+0xa7/0xc0
__rpm_callback+0x41/0x110
rpm_callback+0x59/0x70
rpm_resume+0x512/0x7b0
__pm_runtime_resume+0x4a/0x90
__device_release_driver+0x28/0x240
device_release_driver+0x26/0x40
pci_stop_bus_device+0x68/0x90
pci_stop_bus_device+0x2c/0x90
pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0xe/0x20
pciehp_unconfigure_device+0x6c/0x110
pciehp_disable_slot+0x5b/0xe0
pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change+0xc3/0x2f0
pciehp_ist+0x179/0x180
This lockdep warning is triggered because with Thunderbolt, hotplug ports
are nested. When removing multiple devices in a daisy-chain, each hotplug
port's reset_lock may be acquired recursively. It's never the same lock, so
the lockdep splat is a false positive.
Because locks at the same hierarchy level are never acquired recursively, a
per-level lockdep class is sufficient to fix the lockdep warning.
The choice to use one lockdep subclass per pcie-hotplug controller in the
path to the root-bus was made to conserve class keys because their number
is limited and the complexity grows quadratically with number of keys
according to Documentation/locking/lockdep-design.rst.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/[email protected]/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208855
Reported-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <[email protected]>
0 commit comments