Skip to content

docs: add 'skeleton loaders' to loading placeholders description #41177

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2025
Merged

docs: add 'skeleton loaders' to loading placeholders description #41177

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 9, 2025

Conversation

MohamadSalman11
Copy link
Contributor

@MohamadSalman11 MohamadSalman11 commented Jan 24, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Description

Added 'skeleton loaders' as an alternative term for loading placeholders in docs

Motivation & Context

It’s also widely known as skeleton loaders

Type of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Refactoring (non-breaking change)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing guidelines
  • My code follows the code style of the project (using npm run lint)
  • My change introduces changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly
  • I have added tests to cover my changes
  • All new and existing tests passed

Live previews

@mdo mdo added this to v5.3.6 Apr 9, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to To do in v5.3.6 Apr 9, 2025
@mdo mdo merged commit 690fbfd into twbs:main Apr 9, 2025
14 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from To do to Done in v5.3.6 Apr 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mdo mdo mdo approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
v5.3.6
Status: Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@MohamadSalman11 @mdo