-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 369
fix remote file stream function #1620
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes to the 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)ROADMAP.md (1)
The status update from Planned (🔷) to Done (✅) for "EC-TIME timeout when transferring large files" aligns with the improvements made to handle file streaming asynchronously. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pkg/wshrpc/wshremote/wshremote.go (1)
198-198
: Consider adjusting logging level.Logging the size of the response can be helpful for debugging, but in a production environment it may generate large amounts of log data. Confirm whether this should be a debug log.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pkg/wshrpc/wshremote/wshremote.go
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
pkg/wshrpc/wshremote/wshremote.go (7)
190-190
: Good use of a separate goroutine to handle file streaming asynchronously.
This ensures non-blocking behavior for the caller.
191-191
: Ensure consistent closure of the channel.
Placing defer close(ch)
right after launching the goroutine guarantees that the channel is closed exactly once, preventing potential deadlocks or double-close panics.
192-192
: Verify context cancellation handling within remoteStreamFileInternal
.
While this code properly checks ctx.Err()
within the helper functions, confirm that all resources are properly cleaned up if the context is canceled midway through the streaming process.
193-193
: Local struct initialization is straightforward and readable.
Creating a new response struct before populating it ensures clarity.
195-196
: Check for zero-length data edge cases.
If the read returns zero bytes repeatedly (e.g., when the file is exhausted), confirm that your streaming logic handles it gracefully. Currently, no data is encoded if length is zero, which is correct.
199-199
: Channel-based asynchronous messaging is well-implemented.
Sending encapsulated responses through the channel is clear and idiomatic for Go.
201-202
: Ensure the error is sent before channel closure.
The code sends the error to the channel and then relies on defer close(ch)
. This pattern is correct; just ensure there are no additional writes to the channel after an error is sent, which might cause confusion or unintended consumption patterns.
No description provided.