Skip to content

fix remote file stream function #1620

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 26, 2024
Merged

fix remote file stream function #1620

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 26, 2024

Conversation

sawka
Copy link
Member

@sawka sawka commented Dec 24, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the RemoteStreamFileCommand method in the ServerImpl struct within the pkg/wshrpc/wshremote/wshremote.go file. The primary modification involves refactoring the file streaming logic to execute asynchronously using a goroutine. This change enables the method to manage the channel ch more effectively by closing it after the completion of the streaming process. The implementation now supports non-blocking file streaming, with improved error handling that allows errors to be sent through the channel if they occur during the internal streaming operation. The modification maintains the original method signature while introducing an asynchronous approach to file streaming. Additionally, the roadmap in ROADMAP.md has been updated to reflect the status change of the "EC-TIME timeout when transferring large files" feature from "Planned" to "Done," and the "Log Viewer" feature has been removed from the stretch goals section.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7509dd and c766bd8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ROADMAP.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
ROADMAP.md (1)

17-17: LGTM: Status update reflects the completed file streaming enhancement

The status update from Planned (🔷) to Done (✅) for "EC-TIME timeout when transferring large files" aligns with the improvements made to handle file streaming asynchronously.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pkg/wshrpc/wshremote/wshremote.go (1)

198-198: Consider adjusting logging level.

Logging the size of the response can be helpful for debugging, but in a production environment it may generate large amounts of log data. Confirm whether this should be a debug log.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c1cf539 and c7509dd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pkg/wshrpc/wshremote/wshremote.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
pkg/wshrpc/wshremote/wshremote.go (7)

190-190: Good use of a separate goroutine to handle file streaming asynchronously.

This ensures non-blocking behavior for the caller.


191-191: Ensure consistent closure of the channel.

Placing defer close(ch) right after launching the goroutine guarantees that the channel is closed exactly once, preventing potential deadlocks or double-close panics.


192-192: Verify context cancellation handling within remoteStreamFileInternal.

While this code properly checks ctx.Err() within the helper functions, confirm that all resources are properly cleaned up if the context is canceled midway through the streaming process.


193-193: Local struct initialization is straightforward and readable.

Creating a new response struct before populating it ensures clarity.


195-196: Check for zero-length data edge cases.

If the read returns zero bytes repeatedly (e.g., when the file is exhausted), confirm that your streaming logic handles it gracefully. Currently, no data is encoded if length is zero, which is correct.


199-199: Channel-based asynchronous messaging is well-implemented.

Sending encapsulated responses through the channel is clear and idiomatic for Go.


201-202: Ensure the error is sent before channel closure.

The code sends the error to the channel and then relies on defer close(ch). This pattern is correct; just ensure there are no additional writes to the channel after an error is sent, which might cause confusion or unintended consumption patterns.

@sawka sawka merged commit 904d942 into main Dec 26, 2024
8 checks passed
@sawka sawka deleted the sawka/fix-ec-time-err branch December 26, 2024 18:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant