Skip to content

Web Search #1631

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Dec 29, 2024
Merged

Web Search #1631

merged 17 commits into from
Dec 29, 2024

Conversation

esimkowitz
Copy link
Member

Adds support for Cmd:f, Ctrl:f, and Alt:f to activate search in the Web and Help widgets

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces comprehensive enhancements to the search functionality across multiple frontend files. The changes include updates to the SearchComponent to support additional optional properties such as onSearch, onNext, and onPrev, along with improved state management for search-related variables. Two new functions, activateSearch and deactivateSearch, are added to manage the search state using keyboard shortcuts "Cmd+f", "Ctrl+f", and "Escape".

The WebView component is enhanced to integrate search features directly, utilizing the useSearch hook and implementing callback functions for search actions. A new type declaration SearchAtoms is introduced to encapsulate search-related state management, and the ViewModel interface is updated accordingly. Additionally, a new CSS class .webview-container is created to maintain consistent styling. Overall, these changes focus on improving user interaction and functionality related to search within the application.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f11a319 and e1f5245.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/app/element/search.tsx (5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • frontend/app/element/search.tsx

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
frontend/app/element/search.tsx (2)

39-43: Resetting state on isOpen change.
This ensures the search UI always starts fresh when it opens. However, if you want to preserve search text after closing, consider removing this reset.


53-63: Logging rects to console.
Consider removing or gating behind a debug flag for production builds to avoid cluttering logs.

frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (2)

546-552: Error handling in onSearch callback.
Consider providing user feedback or retry logic if searching fails. It currently just logs the error.

 try {
   model.webviewRef.current?.findInPage(search);
 } catch (e) {
   console.error("Failed to search", e);
+  // Potentially show a toast or user-visible error message here
 }

567-575: Strongly-type the event if possible.
You're currently typing the parameter as any. Consider a more precise type to ensure better readability and maintainability.

- const onFoundInPage = useCallback((event: any) => {
+ interface FoundInPageEvent extends Event {
+   result?: { matches: number; activeMatchOrdinal: number };
+ }
+ const onFoundInPage = useCallback((event: FoundInPageEvent) => {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 73561dc and 4445e74.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • frontend/app/element/search.tsx (5 hunks)
  • frontend/app/store/keymodel.ts (1 hunks)
  • frontend/app/view/webview/webview.scss (1 hunks)
  • frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (6 hunks)
  • frontend/types/custom.d.ts (2 hunks)
  • frontend/util/keyutil.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (25)
frontend/app/element/search.tsx (9)

3-3: Use of Jotai imports looks good.
The import statement for atom and useAtom is appropriate for managing state.


9-15: Flexible callback props are well-introduced.
Declaring optional onSearch, onNext, and onPrev allows for more extensible usage without forcing the consumer to provide these callbacks. Good job keeping them optional.


26-28: Callbacks usage is consistent.
Using fallback behavior when callbacks are not provided maintains backward compatibility.


30-33: Atom state usage is clear.
The code properly destructures the required search states from Jotai. This is clean and readable.


45-50: onSearch triggered only for non-empty input.
This is a sensible approach to avoid sending extraneous updates, but ensure the caller also handles empty searches if needed.


83-91: Split behaviors for Previous/Next clicks is excellent.
The code uses onPrev or onNext if available; otherwise, it falls back to internal index control. This is a well-designed fallback structure.


106-106: Auto-focus on <Input> enhances usability.
This is a great user experience decision for immediate text entry.


128-128: Extended hook signature is cohesive.
Accepting viewModel and optionally assigning searchAtoms to it fosters better integration.


134-140: ViewModel synchronization looks correct.
Synchronizing searchAtoms with the provided viewModel ensures a single source of truth.

frontend/util/keyutil.ts (1)

81-83: Clean mapping of "Esc" to "Escape".
This is consistent with typical browser key naming. It improves clarity for event handling.

frontend/types/custom.d.ts (2)

231-236: Encapsulating search states into SearchAtoms.
This strongly groups relevant atoms, keeping the code organized and maintainable.


249-249: Optional searchAtoms in ViewModel
Provides a flexible mechanism for search integration. This maintains backward compatibility for other components not using search.

frontend/app/store/keymodel.ts (3)

324-333: activateSearch effectively opens the search UI.
Ensuring that we check if searchAtoms exist protects against null references. This approach gracefully degrades when search is not available.


334-342: deactivateSearch gracefully closes the search UI.
Similar to its counterpart, this function ensures toggling is done only if search is currently active.


343-345: Keyboard shortcuts are effectively mapped.
Binding "Cmd+f", "Ctrl+f", and "Escape" to search activation/deactivation is straightforward and intuitive for users.

frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (9)

5-5: Imports look good.
It's great to see the Search and useSearch imports pulled in here, aligning with the PR objective of adding search functionality.


16-16: Verify Jotai dependencies.
Ensure that the appropriate version of Jotai (or any supporting library) is in the project's dependencies to avoid runtime issues.


540-545: Initialization of searchProps.
You’re cleanly retrieving the search atoms and handlers here. This structure is neat and sets up the search logic in a modular way.


553-559: Next-search callback looks good.
This effectively handles jump-to-next-result. Ensure that any wrapping logic (e.g., going from the last match back to the first) is handled according to UX requirements.


560-566: Previous-search callback looks good.
Similar to onSearchNext, confirm desired behavior when the user is at the first match.


576-584: Graceful search clearing.
Stopping the find operation when search is closed is correct. This prevents leftover highlights from persisting in the webview.


718-718: Correct event listener addition for "found-in-page".
This listener appropriately calls onFoundInPage to handle matched results.


734-734: Proper cleanup of the event listener.
Removing the "found-in-page" listener prevents memory leaks and ensures no stale references remain.


756-756: Search component usage is clear.
Providing the search callbacks and props here is straightforward and follows the newly introduced search pattern.

frontend/app/view/webview/webview.scss (1)

4-5: Unified styling for .webview and .webview-container.
Combining these ensures consistent appearance and layout. Verify if any container-specific properties are needed to differentiate the two in the future.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (1)

541-581: Implementation of search callbacks

This block introduces callbacks (onSearch, onSearchNext, onSearchPrev, and onFoundInPage) to integrate searching within the webview. Overall, this is a solid approach, and the code appears correct. However, please consider the following points:

  1. Dependency arrays: The useCallback hooks for onSearch and onFoundInPage have empty dependency arrays ([]), but they reference external values (model.webviewRef). Ensure that model is stable or include it in the dependency array if needed.
  2. Error handling: The try/catch blocks log errors via console.error. That is acceptable for now, but consider whether you need more robust user-facing error handling.

Other than that, the logic for updating search results and the currently selected match ordinal is well-structured.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4445e74 and 6920cc9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • frontend/app/element/search.tsx (5 hunks)
  • frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (18)
frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (5)

5-5: Imported Search and useSearch

These imports are essential to integrate the new search functionality into the WebView. The usage appears correct.


16-16: Additional imports from jotai

The newly imported Jotai elements (Atom, PrimitiveAtom, etc.) facilitate reactive state management for search. This is well-aligned with the rest of the code's approach.


715-715: Adding found-in-page listener

Registering this listener is the key to integrating the search notifications. Good job hooking it into onFoundInPage.


731-731: Removing found-in-page listener on unmount

Properly cleaning up event listeners prevents potential memory leaks. This is a best practice.


753-753: Rendering the <Search> component

Embedding <Search> with onSearch, onNext, and onPrev props is consistent with the new integrated search logic. This approach is clean, ensures good separation of concerns, and clarifies the flow of data to the user.

frontend/app/element/search.tsx (13)

3-4: New imports

Importing the Jotai and React hooks ensures that the search component can manage and track state effectively. This is consistent with modern React usage.


9-15: Extending SearchProps with optional callbacks

The addition of onSearch, onNext, and onPrev enables customizable behavior. Keeping them optional is a good design choice, allowing flexible integration while preserving backward compatibility.


26-28: Destructuring callback props

Extracting onSearch, onNext, and onPrev early improves readability and prevents repeated prop lookups later in the code.


30-31: Atom usage for isOpen

You are using Jotai atoms to manage the open/close state of the search. This is straightforward and consistent with the rest of the file's approach.


39-43: Resetting state upon toggling search

Clearing out the search, index, and number of results whenever isOpen changes helps ensure fresh state each time the user opens the search panel.


45-49: Triggering search logic

Automatically calling onSearch whenever the user updates the search term is very intuitive. The fallback to clearing selection on empty input is well thought out.


52-60: Offset calculation logic in useCallback

Using the floating UI offset middleware to compute dynamic offsets is a clean approach. Logging the rects could help in debugging layout issues.


62-62: Pushing offset middleware

Appending the offset middleware to the array is correct. Ensures that the floating element is positioned relative to the anchor reference intelligently.


82-82: Implementing onPrev for search navigation

Using the optional callback onPrev?.() ?? setIndex(index - 1) makes the feature extensible while providing a fallback index decrement behavior.


90-90: Implementing onNext for search navigation

Similarly, onNext?.() ?? setIndex(index + 1) ensures consistent forward navigation logic with an easy fallback if no custom callback is provided.


105-105: Rendering the input box for search

Providing autoFocus on the input is a thoughtful touch that improves user experience, ensuring the user can start typing right away.


127-127: New optional parameter in useSearch

Adding viewModel?: ViewModel is a good approach, enabling broader integrations while keeping the function signature flexible.


133-139: Syncing atoms to viewModel

Assigning searchAtoms to viewModel.searchAtoms effectively centralizes search state. This is convenient if you need to retrieve or manipulate those atoms from elsewhere in the app.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (4)

394-398: Consider removing or updating logging statements.

While the logic to prevent focus when search is active is correct, the logging statements might be too verbose for production code. Consider either:

  1. Removing them
  2. Making them debug-level logs
  3. Adding more context about why the focus was prevented
-        console.log("webview giveFocus");
+        // console.debug("webview giveFocus");
         if (this.searchAtoms && globalStore.get(this.searchAtoms.isOpenAtom)) {
-            console.log("search is open, not giving focus");
+            // console.debug("webview: preventing focus due to active search");
             return true;
         }

553-563: Enhance error handling in search operations.

The current error handling only logs the error. Consider providing user feedback when search operations fail.

         } catch (e) {
-            console.error("Failed to search", e);
+            console.error("Failed to search:", e);
+            // Notify user of search failure
+            if (model.webviewRef.current) {
+                model.webviewRef.current.stopFindInPage("clearSelection");
+            }
         }

578-586: Improve type safety for found-in-page event handling.

The event parameter is typed as any. Consider creating a proper type definition for the event.

+    interface FoundInPageEvent {
+        result: {
+            matches: number;
+            activeMatchOrdinal: number;
+            finalUpdate: boolean;
+        };
+    }
+
-    const onFoundInPage = useCallback((event: any) => {
+    const onFoundInPage = useCallback((event: FoundInPageEvent) => {

721-721: Consider clearing search on component unmount.

To prevent potential memory leaks and ensure proper cleanup, consider clearing any active searches when the component unmounts.

         return () => {
+            // Clear any active searches
+            if (model.webviewRef.current) {
+                model.webviewRef.current.stopFindInPage("clearSelection");
+            }
             webview.removeEventListener("did-frame-navigate", navigateListener);
             // ... other removeEventListener calls ...
             webview.removeEventListener("found-in-page", onFoundInPage);
         };

Also applies to: 737-737, 759-759

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6920cc9 and f9813b4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (8 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (1)

5-5: LGTM: Search-related changes to imports and model.

The additions of Search-related imports and the optional searchAtoms property to WebViewModel are well-structured and align with the PR's objective of adding search functionality.

Also applies to: 16-17, 54-54

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (4)

54-54: Add null check for better defensive programming.

While the search state management is correct, consider adding a null check before accessing searchAtoms in the handleNavigate method to make the code more robust.

-if (this.searchAtoms) {
+if (this.searchAtoms?.isOpenAtom) {
     globalStore.set(this.searchAtoms.isOpenAtom, false);
 }

Also applies to: 301-303


397-401: Consider removing debug console.log statements.

The search state check is correctly implemented, but consider removing or replacing the console.log statements with proper logging for production code.

-console.log("webview giveFocus");
 if (this.searchAtoms && globalStore.get(this.searchAtoms.isOpenAtom)) {
-    console.log("search is open, not giving focus");
     return true;
 }

550-565: Enhance error handling with specific error messages.

The error handling could be more informative by including specific error details.

 } catch (e) {
-    console.error("Failed to search", e);
+    console.error(`Failed to search with query "${search}":`, e);
 }

580-588: Consider adding validation for search results.

The search index calculation assumes the activeMatchOrdinal is always positive. Consider adding validation and handling edge cases.

 if (!result) {
     return;
 }
+const activeMatch = Math.max(0, result.activeMatchOrdinal - 1);
 setNumSearchResults(result.matches);
-setSearchIndex(result.activeMatchOrdinal - 1);
+setSearchIndex(activeMatch);
-console.log("found in page", result);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9813b4 and ec8d4ae.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (9 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (3)

5-5: LGTM: Required imports for search functionality.

The imports for Search component, useSearch hook, and necessary types are correctly added.

Also applies to: 16-17


723-723: LGTM: Proper event listener management.

The found-in-page event listener is correctly added and cleaned up following React best practices.

Also applies to: 739-739


761-761: LGTM: Search component integration.

The Search component is correctly integrated with all necessary props for search functionality.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (4)

54-54: Add null check for better defensive programming.

While the logic is correct, consider adding a null check before accessing the searchAtoms property to make the code more robust.

-if (this.searchAtoms) {
+if (this.searchAtoms?.isOpenAtom) {
     globalStore.set(this.searchAtoms.isOpenAtom, false);
 }

Also applies to: 301-303


397-401: Remove debug console.log statements.

Consider removing or replacing the console.log statements with proper logging for production code.

-console.log("webview giveFocus");
-if (this.searchAtoms && globalStore.get(this.searchAtoms.isOpenAtom)) {
-    console.log("search is open, not giving focus");
+if (this.searchAtoms && globalStore.get(this.searchAtoms.isOpenAtom)) {
     return true;
 }

555-565: Improve error handling in search function.

The catch block could provide more specific error handling and user feedback.

 } catch (e) {
-    console.error("Failed to search", e);
+    console.error("Failed to search:", e);
+    // Consider showing user feedback through a toast or error message
+    if (e instanceof Error) {
+        // Handle specific error types
+    }
 }

580-588: Type the event parameter properly.

The any type for the event parameter should be replaced with a proper type definition.

-const onFoundInPage = useCallback((event: any) => {
+interface FindInPageResult {
+    result: {
+        matches: number;
+        activeMatchOrdinal: number;
+    };
+}
+
+const onFoundInPage = useCallback((event: FindInPageResult) => {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec8d4ae and 9f08662.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • frontend/app/element/search.tsx (5 hunks)
  • frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (9 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • frontend/app/element/search.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (3)

5-5: LGTM: Required imports for search functionality.

The imports for Search component, useSearch hook, and necessary types are correctly added.

Also applies to: 16-17


723-723: LGTM: Proper event listener management.

The found-in-page event listener is correctly added and cleaned up following React best practices.

Also applies to: 739-739


761-761: LGTM: Search component integration.

The Search component is correctly integrated with all required props for search functionality.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (3)

54-54: Add null check for better defensive programming.

While the implementation is correct, consider adding a null check before accessing searchAtoms.isOpenAtom for better defensive programming.

 if (this.searchAtoms) {
-    globalStore.set(this.searchAtoms.isOpenAtom, false);
+    const { isOpenAtom } = this.searchAtoms;
+    if (isOpenAtom) {
+        globalStore.set(isOpenAtom, false);
+    }
 }

Also applies to: 301-303


397-401: Remove debug console.log statements.

Consider removing the debug console.log statements before merging to production.

-console.log("webview giveFocus");
 if (this.searchAtoms && globalStore.get(this.searchAtoms.isOpenAtom)) {
-    console.log("search is open, not giving focus");
     return true;
 }

550-592: Enhance search implementation with better error handling and constants.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Remove debug console.log statements
  2. Extract search options into constants
  3. Improve error handling with specific error messages
+const SEARCH_OPTIONS = {
+    NEXT: { findNext: false, forward: true },
+    PREV: { findNext: false, forward: false },
+};

 const onSearchNext = useCallback(() => {
     try {
-        console.log("search next", searchVal);
-        model.webviewRef.current?.findInPage(searchVal, { findNext: false, forward: true });
+        model.webviewRef.current?.findInPage(searchVal, SEARCH_OPTIONS.NEXT);
     } catch (e) {
-        console.error("Failed to search next", e);
+        console.error(`Failed to search next: ${e.message}`);
     }
 }, [searchVal]);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9f08662 and 3a0e60b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • frontend/app/element/search.tsx (5 hunks)
  • frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (9 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • frontend/app/element/search.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
frontend/app/view/webview/webview.tsx (3)

5-5: LGTM: Required imports for search functionality.

The imports are correctly added and necessary for implementing the search feature.

Also applies to: 16-17


725-725: LGTM: Proper event listener management.

The found-in-page event listener is correctly added and cleaned up, following React best practices.

Also applies to: 741-741


763-763: LGTM: Clean Search component integration.

The Search component is properly integrated with all necessary props for search functionality.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/app/element/search.tsx (1)

111-122: Consider adding keyboard shortcut hints to button titles

To improve user experience, consider adding the keyboard shortcuts to the button titles.

 const prevDecl: IconButtonDecl = {
     elemtype: "iconbutton",
     icon: "chevron-up",
-    title: "Previous Result",
+    title: "Previous Result (Shift+Enter)",
     click: onPrevWrapper,
 };

 const nextDecl: IconButtonDecl = {
     elemtype: "iconbutton",
     icon: "chevron-down",
-    title: "Next Result",
+    title: "Next Result (Enter)",
     click: onNextWrapper,
 };
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3a0e60b and f11a319.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/app/element/search.tsx (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
frontend/app/element/search.tsx (4)

3-4: LGTM: Type definitions and imports are well-structured

The new SearchProps type properly extends SearchAtoms and includes well-typed optional callbacks for search operations. The additional imports support the enhanced state management using Jotai atoms.

Also applies to: 9-15


39-49: LGTM: State management is properly implemented

The useEffect hooks appropriately handle state reset when search is closed and trigger the onSearch callback when search text changes.


165-177: LGTM: useSearch hook properly manages search state

The hook correctly initializes atoms and properly updates the viewModel when provided. The null coalescing for anchorRef provides a good fallback.


97-109: Verify keyboard shortcut implementation

The PR objectives mention adding Cmd+f, Ctrl+f, and Alt+f shortcuts, but these aren't handled in this component. Please verify if these shortcuts are implemented elsewhere in the codebase.

@esimkowitz esimkowitz merged commit 477052e into main Dec 29, 2024
8 checks passed
@esimkowitz esimkowitz deleted the evan/search-webview branch December 29, 2024 17:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant