Skip to content

LWM2M configs not defined #1429

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
nashif opened this issue Sep 9, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed

LWM2M configs not defined #1429

nashif opened this issue Sep 9, 2017 · 7 comments
Assignees
@mike-scott
Labels
bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug priority: low Low impact/importance bug

Comments

@nashif
Copy link
Member

nashif commented Sep 9, 2017

LWM2M_BOOTSTRAP_SERVER not defined anywhere, yet being used here:

subsys/net/lib/lwm2m/lwm2m_rd_client.c:#if defined(CONFIG_LWM2M_BOOTSTRAP_SERVER)
@nashif
Copy link
Member Author

nashif commented Sep 9, 2017

same for
LWM2M_SECURITY_OBJ_SUPPORT
LWM2M_DEVICE_PWRSRC_MAX

@nashif nashif added the bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug label Sep 9, 2017
@mike-scott
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @nashif. I'll include fixing these in my next series.

@nashif
Copy link
Member Author

nashif commented Oct 30, 2017

was this fixed?

@mike-scott
Copy link
Contributor

Not yet. I can land a patch for this after the multi-fragment support is merged.

@mike-scott
Copy link
Contributor

These configs will be addressed in the upcoming patches to support LwM2M bootstrap. If there's a priority I can remove them, but some of the code will come right back later.

@nashif nashif added the priority: low Low impact/importance bug label Nov 6, 2017
nagineni pushed a commit to nagineni/zephyr that referenced this issue Nov 20, 2017
@cuiyanx
[docs] Update buffer.md for link fix (zephyrproject-rtos#1429)
f3625a8 
Signed-off-by: Cui Yan <[email protected]>
@mike-scott
Copy link
Contributor

This adds the LWM2M_DEVICE_PWRSRC_MAX config:
#6042

@nashif
Copy link
Member Author

nashif commented Nov 5, 2018

looks like this is resolved now

@nashif nashif closed this as completed Nov 5, 2018
@ghost ghost removed the to do label Nov 5, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mike-scott mike-scott

Labels
bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug priority: low Low impact/importance bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@nashif @mike-scott @zephyrbot