Skip to content

arch: isr_wrapper: Place _isr_wrapper closer to _IntExit #11184

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

SebastianBoe
Copy link
Collaborator

Put _isr_wrapper and _IntExit in the same file to ensure that they are
placed close together. When they are placed too far away from each
other the 'b' instruction in _isr_wrapper will not reach _IntExit on
Cortex-M0 platforms.

See #11167 for
details.

Fixes #11167

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Bøe [email protected]

Put _isr_wrapper and _IntExit in the same file to ensure that they are
placed close together. When they are placed too far away from each
other the 'b' instruction in _isr_wrapper will not reach _IntExit on
Cortex-M0 platforms.

See zephyrproject-rtos#11167 for
details.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Bøe <[email protected]>
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #11184 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #11184   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   53.11%   53.11%           
=======================================
  Files         218      218           
  Lines       26871    26871           
  Branches     5952     5952           
=======================================
  Hits        14273    14273           
  Misses      10163    10163           
  Partials     2435     2435

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 39c3c4e...f91cf84. Read the comment docs.

@SebastianBoe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It might be possible to use BX, which would be a cleaner solution ...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Building failing in arm cortex-m0
3 participants