Skip to content

kernel: Migrate to new logging subsys #9359

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

Olivier-ProGlove
Copy link
Contributor

Migrate from SYS_LOG to LOG logging mechanism.

Signed-off-by: Olivier Martin [email protected]

Migrate from SYS_LOG to LOG logging mechanism.

Signed-off-by: Olivier Martin <[email protected]>
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #9359 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #9359   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   52.52%   52.52%           
=======================================
  Files         201      201           
  Lines       25359    25359           
  Branches     5299     5299           
=======================================
  Hits        13320    13320           
  Misses       9944     9944           
  Partials     2095     2095

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3712fd3...9996c6f. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@nashif nashif left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the commit is talking about kernel, yet I only see one file being changed and then the module is called userspace. why userspace? why not kernel?

Looks like this lonely log call needs to be converted to a printk instead which later will be used as an alias to kernel logger

@nashif
Copy link
Member

nashif commented Oct 8, 2018

addressed in #10029

@nashif nashif closed this Oct 8, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants