-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
[rfc] file system benchmark #8316
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
I ran the test on real hardware and the differences are even bigger, the performance test goes in favor of littlefs. |
c57b905
to
2776d5c
Compare
Removed WIP, I think this is usable enough as-is. I used it to test #8715 too. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you want me to ignore this issue, please mark it with the "State: don't stale" label. Thank you for your contributions. |
Contribution description
This is based on #8315 and #8239.
This provide an app to benchmark the file systems using vfs.
Results
I've run the test on native with the emulated mtd device for spiffs and littlefs with the following results.
spiffs
Binary size:
Timings:
littlefs
Binary size:
Timings:
Differences