Skip to content

[JA] translate Deep Freeze documents #3115

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

t-ube
Copy link
Contributor

@t-ube t-ube commented May 14, 2025

No description provided.

Tonibrown20

This comment was marked as spam.

Topher68chris
Topher68chris previously approved these changes May 14, 2025
@tequdev tequdev self-requested a review May 20, 2025 02:15
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
---
blurb: ディープフリーズは、トラストラインの凍結が解除されるまで、凍結されたトークン保有者がその資金を送受信できないようにします。
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Currently “freeze” translated is as “凍結”.
Are there any other translation ideas for “deep freeze” other than “ディープフリーズ”?
I think there are several options for translating those words.

  1. "凍結" and "ディープフリーズ" (as is)
  2. "凍結" and "some word which kanji-based “deepfreeze”" (both kanji)
  3. "フリーズ" and "ディープフリーズ" (both katakana)
  4. "freeze" and "deep freeze" (both as is english)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Personally, I feel that using "フリーズ" and "ディープフリーズ" is the best option.
Since "ディープフリーズ" is easier to understand when left as-is, I think we should update "凍結" to "フリーズ" for consistency.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you create a PR to update existing pages that use”凍結"?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I've already created a PR for that.
You can find it here: #3123

Tonibrown20
Tonibrown20 previously approved these changes May 20, 2025
Copy link

@Tonibrown20 Tonibrown20 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Activated

@t-ube t-ube force-pushed the ja-deep-freeze branch from ce7662d to 4cd3709 Compare May 27, 2025 04:21
@amarantha-k amarantha-k dismissed stale reviews from Tonibrown20 and Topher68chris May 29, 2025 17:47

Unknown user; does not have sufficient permissions to approve PRs on the repository.

Copy link
Collaborator

@mDuo13 mDuo13 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@mDuo13 mDuo13 requested a review from tequdev June 5, 2025 19:41
Copy link
Contributor

@tequdev tequdev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants