Add tasklisttype flag to ListTaskListPartitions #6711
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
arzonus
requested review from
Shaddoll,
neil-xie,
davidporter-id-au,
Groxx,
shijiesheng,
jakobht,
3vilhamster,
sankari165,
dkrotx,
taylanisikdemir and
demirkayaender
as code owners
dkrotx
approved these changes
Mar 5, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed?
An optional
tasklisttypeflag has been added tocadence tasklist list-partitioncommand.Why?
By default, the command is used to return only decision task list partitions, and activity task list partitions only in case if number of decision tasks list partitions is zero. Mostly, the command's behavior will not be changed, however, it allows a customer to retrieve activity task list partitions that weren't possible before.
In ideal,
task list typeshould be passed to the server, however, it's not a part of this PR, and this optimization can be added in the future.How did you test it?
Manual test
Potential risks
No risks
Release notes
Documentation Changes