make it clear that the attribute represents the project id

[topliceanu]

Projects in GCP have an id, a name and a project_number. All seem to uniquely identify your project. In this case it is the id that is required.

[eilgin]

Wouldn't have it been better to say "The project id [...]" ?
Besides, it's not the only time when the doc refers to "project" when describing the project id.

[topliceanu]

I see, that is a good point. I'll scan the doc and see where I can find project being used instead of
"project id". Thanks for getting back to me!

[paddycarver]

I'm on board with this, though I think it may have some confusion (e.g., people thinking it's the project number) but that's not something we can really help, I don't think. Only nitpick: ID, not id. :)

[topliceanu]

Hi guys! Sorry about being late with this. I went through the docs and updated the resources.

I went with the ID of the project .... Event though it sounds a bit forced, I think it makes more sense than Project ID ... for most of the sentences. That being said, not a native speaker here.

Also, I haven't actually checked whether all these resource actually use the value of the project attribute as the Project ID, but I assume so, if they didn't it would be terribly inconsistent. How can I test this?

Let me know how I can improve this PR! Thanks!

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!