tests: static_idt: Add description and RTM links

[ajaykish]

Add doxygen groups, description and RTM links for
static idt test cases

Signed-off-by: Ajay Kishore [email protected]

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #9321 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #9321   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   52.51%   52.51%           
=======================================
  Files         202      202           
  Lines       25396    25396           
  Branches     5328     5328           
=======================================
  Hits        13337    13337           
  Misses       9960     9960           
  Partials     2099     2099

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 61ec512...7e79daa. Read the comment docs.

[nashif]

why are you changing checkpatch.pl?

[ajaykish]

@nashif I was getting below warnings during execution of ./scripts/checkpatch.pl for tests/kernel/static_idt/src/main.c :

tests/kernel/static_idt/src/main.c:92: WARNING:FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS: function definition argument 'exc_divide_error_handler' should also have an identifier name
#92: FILE: tests/kernel/static_idt/src/main.c:92:
+extern void *_EXCEPTION_STUB_NAME(exc_divide_error_handler, IV_DIVIDE_ERROR);

tests/kernel/static_idt/src/main.c:92: WARNING:FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS: function definition argument 'IV_DIVIDE_ERROR' should also have an identifier name
#92: FILE: tests/kernel/static_idt/src/main.c:92:
+extern void *_EXCEPTION_STUB_NAME(exc_divide_error_handler, IV_DIVIDE_ERROR);

So added support function pointers for unnamed function definition in checkpatch.pl.

[nashif]

So added support function pointers for unnamed function definition in checkpatch.pl.

thats not how it works, you cant just be patching checkpatch whenever you get some warnings or errors, if you think you can improve checkpatch, send a separate patch with the enhancement, otherwise you can raise this issue in the PR as being a false negative for reviewers to ignore it.

[ajaykish]

@nashif removed the checkpatch related changes, and raised a GH issue #9411 for the warning generated by checkpatch.pl.